Skip to content

Conversation

@smhigley
Copy link
Contributor

Type: feature

The following has been addressed in the PR:

  • There is a related issue
  • All code matches the style guide
  • Unit or Functional tests are included in the PR

Description:

The HTML form attribute has been pulled from spec, so I think it makes sense to remove it. Additionally, based on chatting with other a11y folks, I think it makes sense to provide the option to explicitly associate a Label with a form field with id/for. In the past some screen readers had variable behavior with nested form fields, and having the for attribute provides more flexibility to the widget.

@smhigley smhigley merged commit da4315d into dojo:master Sep 19, 2017
@dylans dylans added this to the 2017.09 milestone Sep 25, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants