-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 124
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Do not emit stat if we are skipping block #1202
Conversation
WalkthroughThe modification involves refining the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- indexer/services/ender/src/lib/on-message.ts (4 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
indexer/services/ender/src/lib/on-message.ts (1)
- 68-75: The changes from lines 68 to 75 introduce a new timing metric for measuring the time messages spend in the queue before being processed. This is a good addition for monitoring and performance analysis. However, it's important to ensure that the
message.timestamp
is always present and in the expected format to avoid potential runtime errors due to type mismatches or undefined values.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- indexer/services/ender/tests/lib/on-message.test.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
indexer/services/ender/__tests__/lib/on-message.test.ts (1)
- 764-764: The change to use
not.toHaveBeenCalledWith
forstats.timing
aligns with the PR's objective to optimize performance by not emitting stats under certain conditions. This is a sensible adjustment given the context.However, it's important to verify that this change does not inadvertently affect other parts of the system where timing stats might still be relevant.
Verification successful
The change to use
not.toHaveBeenCalledWith
forstats.timing
in the specific test file is a localized change that does not directly impact the usage or functionality ofstats.timing
in other parts of the system. The widespread use ofstats.timing
across various functionalities indicates its integral role, and the change in the test assertion does not alter this. Therefore, the review comment is accurate in its approval of the change, and concerns about potential unintended impacts on other parts of the system are unfounded based on the evidence provided.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the change does not affect other parts of the system unexpectedly. # This script is a placeholder and should be replaced with specific verification steps as needed. echo "Review other usages of stats.timing to ensure they remain unaffected."Length of output: 148
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for occurrences of stats.timing in the codebase to assess their usage and potential impact of the change. rg "stats.timing"Length of output: 13101
Changelist
Do not emit stat if we are skipping block
Test Plan
unit tested
Author/Reviewer Checklist
state-breaking
label.indexer-postgres-breaking
label.PrepareProposal
orProcessProposal
, manually add the labelproposal-breaking
.feature:[feature-name]
.backport/[branch-name]
.refactor
,chore
,bug
.