Skip to content

Conversation

@damskii9992
Copy link
Contributor

I found it easier to make another PR to your PR rather than write down all my suggested changes.

@damskii9992 damskii9992 requested a review from rozyczko November 10, 2025 12:50
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This pull request does not contain a valid label. Please add one of the following labels: ['chore', 'fix', 'bugfix', 'bug', 'enhancement', 'feature', 'dependencies', 'documentation']

@damskii9992 damskii9992 added [scope] enhancement Adds/improves features (major.MINOR.patch) [priority] low Low importance [area] Serialization Anything related to serialization chore PR label labels Nov 10, 2025
Copy link
Member

@rozyczko rozyczko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't understand why you moved the logic to the base class - apart of the Parameter, no derived class will use the dependency serialization.
Also, you are losing the attribute security by removing the extra underscore.

Any good reason for both of these?

@rozyczko rozyczko merged commit 86eab49 into constraints_serialization Nov 18, 2025
34 checks passed
@rozyczko rozyczko deleted the constraints_serialization_update branch November 18, 2025 12:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

[area] Serialization Anything related to serialization chore PR label [priority] low Low importance [scope] enhancement Adds/improves features (major.MINOR.patch)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants