Conversation
artaleks9
added
status/code-review
artaleks9
requested review from
Ohrimenko1988,
SkorikSergey,
dmytro-ndp and
musienko-maxim
SkorikSergey
approved these changes
Jul 12, 2018
Ohrimenko1988
approved these changes
Jul 12, 2018
dmytro-ndp
approved these changes
Jul 12, 2018
Contributor
Author
|
ci-test |
musienko-maxim
approved these changes
Jul 12, 2018
Contributor
|
ci-test build report: |
benoitf
removed
the
status/code-review
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
7 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The reason fail test 'Import Wizard Form' described in the issue #10261 was the new version of the Keycloak and, as consequently, change of the locator of the field (see screenshot):
It was fixed by the commit: Selenium: fix locators for Keycloak Federated Identities page (#10289) (a968899)
The test has a quite many test methods (9), but it was the solution to make minimum quantity of tests in the one-thread-test-suite. So I do not see reasons for something additional changes.
What does this PR do?
What issues does this PR fix or reference?
#10261