Skip to content

Conversation

@eyalkoren
Copy link
Contributor

@eyalkoren eyalkoren commented Jun 12, 2019

No description provided.

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #663 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #663   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     62.11%   62.11%           
  Complexity       68       68           
=========================================
  Files           199      199           
  Lines          7719     7719           
  Branches        947      947           
=========================================
  Hits           4795     4795           
  Misses         2627     2627           
  Partials        297      297

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ee727ac...53d19b7. Read the comment docs.

@eyalkoren eyalkoren changed the title Increase jms timeouts Stabilizing JMS tests Jun 12, 2019
@eyalkoren eyalkoren requested a review from felixbarny June 12, 2019 10:46
@eyalkoren eyalkoren self-assigned this Jun 12, 2019
}

// A utility method for testing the receiveNoWait API consistently
private Message loopReceive(Callable<Message> receiveMethod, @SuppressWarnings("SameParameterValue") long timeout) throws Exception {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

consider using Awaitility

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! But let's merge this now, and consider next time?

@eyalkoren eyalkoren merged commit 0323be3 into elastic:master Jun 12, 2019
@eyalkoren eyalkoren deleted the increase-jms-timeouts branch June 12, 2019 12:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants