-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 601
[Rule Tuning] Linux DR Tuning - 1 #5122
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
⛔️ Test failed Results
|
⛔️ Test failed Results
|
⛔️ Test failed Results
|
[rule.new_terms] | ||
field = "new_terms_fields" | ||
value = ["host.id", "process.group_leader.executable"] | ||
value = ["host.id", "process.parent.executable"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
don't think CS support process.parent.executable as per the Linux EDR matrix, cc @w0rk3r
[rule.new_terms] | ||
field = "new_terms_fields" | ||
value = ["user.name"] | ||
value = ["host.id"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not sure if host.id is mapped correctly
Summary
Misc. Linux DR Tunings