Skip to content

Conversation

theletterf
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #2309

@theletterf theletterf requested review from a team as code owners July 29, 2025 13:54
@theletterf theletterf self-assigned this Jul 29, 2025
@theletterf theletterf added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jul 29, 2025
@theletterf theletterf requested review from a team as code owners July 29, 2025 15:10
@elastic elastic deleted a comment from github-actions bot Jul 29, 2025
@elastic elastic deleted a comment from github-actions bot Jul 29, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@mdbirnstiehl mdbirnstiehl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Great use of snippets.

Copy link
Member

@bmorelli25 bmorelli25 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good stuff 👍 . A couple comments

@elastic elastic deleted a comment from github-actions bot Jul 30, 2025
@elastic elastic deleted a comment from github-actions bot Jul 30, 2025
@elastic elastic deleted a comment from github-actions bot Jul 30, 2025
@elastic elastic deleted a comment from github-actions bot Jul 30, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@leemthompo leemthompo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If @mdbirnstiehl likes it, I like it 👍

@theletterf theletterf requested review from a team and removed request for mlunadia July 30, 2025 09:49
@elastic elastic deleted a comment from github-actions bot Jul 30, 2025
@theletterf theletterf removed the request for review from a team July 30, 2025 09:51
@theletterf theletterf merged commit 32e4692 into main Jul 30, 2025
9 checks passed
@theletterf theletterf deleted the theletterf-add-second-diagram branch July 30, 2025 09:58
colleenmcginnis added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2025
In #2310 we moved the
Fleet-managed and APM Server binary getting started guides to the Fleet
and Elastic Agent section of the reference documentation. Then
Fleet-managed guide could possibly belong there, but the APM binary
guide definitely doesn't since it doesn't use Fleet or Elastic Agent.

Here's my proposal:

* Create a new [Work with APM
Server](https://docs-v3-preview.elastic.dev/elastic/docs-content/pull/2410/solutions/observability/apm/apm-server)
section (a working title) in the Observability solution section of the
docs.
* Put the existing APM Server specific content ([Configure APM
Server](https://www.elastic.co/docs/solutions/observability/apm/configure-apm-server)
and [Monitor APM
Server](https://www.elastic.co/docs/solutions/observability/apm/monitor-apm-server))
into the new _Work with APM Server_ section.
* Create a new subsection in [Work with APM
Server](https://docs-v3-preview.elastic.dev/elastic/docs-content/pull/2410/solutions/observability/apm/apm-server)
that will contain the Fleet-managed and APM Server binary getting
started guides. In this draft PR I called it [Set
up](https://docs-v3-preview.elastic.dev/elastic/docs-content/pull/2410/solutions/observability/apm/apm-server-setup)
to avoid using _Get started_, but I'm not sure if that's the right
title.
* Recreates the comparison content that was removed in
#2310 on the [Set
up](https://docs-v3-preview.elastic.dev/elastic/docs-content/pull/2410/solutions/observability/apm/apm-server-setup)
page.
* Delete the Fleet-managed and APM Server binary getting started guides
from the Fleet and Elastic Agent section.

Alternatives considered:

* Keeping the Fleet-managed getting started guide in the Fleet and
Elastic Agent section of the reference docs, and only moving the binary
guide.
* **Why not?** It makes more sense (especially to me) to keep these two
guides close together alongside the content that helps users decide
between the two approaches.
* Moving both the old getting started guides into a new APM Server
section of the reference section.
* **Why not?** The bulk of the APM Server content is well-established in
the solutions guide. I think users will have a hard time finding
previously established solutions content in a new reference section that
contains only non-reference content.

Is there an alternative approach I'm not considering?

cc @bmorelli25 @theletterf @simitt

---------

Co-authored-by: Brandon Morelli <brandon.morelli@elastic.co>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Rewrite APM get started docs

5 participants