Skip to content

Conversation

@pquentin
Copy link
Member

While those APIs are private, they are needed in Elasticsearch's rest-api-spec, which we want to generate from the specification.

Note that those APIs are surprisingly similar to the connector secret APIs that I've added in #5727.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Following you can find the validation changes against the target branch for the APIs.

API Status Request Response
fleet.delete_secret 🟠 → ⚪ Missing type → Missing test Missing type → Missing test
fleet.get_secret 🟠 → ⚪ Missing type → Missing test Missing type → Missing test
fleet.post_secret 🟠 → ⚪ Missing type → Missing test Missing type → Missing test

You can validate these APIs yourself by using the make validate target.

@pquentin pquentin merged commit aa9dadd into main Nov 25, 2025
15 of 16 checks passed
@pquentin pquentin deleted the fleet-secret branch November 25, 2025 07:03
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2025
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2025
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2025
pquentin added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2025
(cherry picked from commit aa9dadd)

Co-authored-by: Quentin Pradet <quentin.pradet@elastic.co>
pquentin added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2025
(cherry picked from commit aa9dadd)

Co-authored-by: Quentin Pradet <quentin.pradet@elastic.co>
pquentin added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2025
(cherry picked from commit aa9dadd)

Co-authored-by: Quentin Pradet <quentin.pradet@elastic.co>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants