Skip to content

Conversation

@kingherc
Copy link
Contributor

Backports the following commits to 8.x:

Previously if reset was called at the exact marked offset, it
would unnecessarily re-open the current slice and skip bytes.
We now detect this situation, and just do nothing in this case.

Closes ES-10235
@kingherc kingherc added :Distributed Coordination/Snapshot/Restore Anything directly related to the `_snapshot/*` APIs >non-issue auto-merge-without-approval Automatically merge pull request when CI checks pass (NB doesn't wait for reviews!) backport Team:Distributed Coordination Meta label for Distributed Coordination team labels Dec 11, 2024
@kingherc
Copy link
Contributor Author

buildkite test this please

@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine merged commit 5f279ca into elastic:8.x Dec 12, 2024
15 checks passed
@kingherc kingherc deleted the backport/8.x/pr-118437 branch December 12, 2024 15:58
maxhniebergall pushed a commit to maxhniebergall/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2024
Previously if reset was called at the exact marked offset, it
would unnecessarily re-open the current slice and skip bytes.
We now detect this situation, and just do nothing in this case.

Closes ES-10235
maxhniebergall pushed a commit to maxhniebergall/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2024
Previously if reset was called at the exact marked offset, it
would unnecessarily re-open the current slice and skip bytes.
We now detect this situation, and just do nothing in this case.

Closes ES-10235
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

auto-merge-without-approval Automatically merge pull request when CI checks pass (NB doesn't wait for reviews!) backport :Distributed Coordination/Snapshot/Restore Anything directly related to the `_snapshot/*` APIs >non-issue Team:Distributed Coordination Meta label for Distributed Coordination team v8.18.0

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants