Skip to content

Conversation

@fang-xing-esql
Copy link
Member

Backport

This will backport the following commits from main to 9.0:

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation

Co-authored-by: Fang Xing <fang.xing@elastic.co>
(cherry picked from commit a792334)

# Conflicts:
#	x-pack/plugin/esql/src/main/antlr/EsqlBaseLexer.g4
#	x-pack/plugin/esql/src/main/antlr/EsqlBaseLexer.tokens
#	x-pack/plugin/esql/src/main/antlr/EsqlBaseParser.g4
#	x-pack/plugin/esql/src/main/antlr/EsqlBaseParser.tokens
#	x-pack/plugin/esql/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/esql/parser/EsqlBaseLexer.interp
#	x-pack/plugin/esql/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/esql/parser/EsqlBaseLexer.java
#	x-pack/plugin/esql/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/esql/parser/EsqlBaseParser.interp
#	x-pack/plugin/esql/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/esql/parser/EsqlBaseParser.java
#	x-pack/plugin/esql/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/esql/parser/EsqlBaseParserBaseListener.java
#	x-pack/plugin/esql/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/esql/parser/EsqlBaseParserBaseVisitor.java
#	x-pack/plugin/esql/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/esql/parser/EsqlBaseParserListener.java
#	x-pack/plugin/esql/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/esql/parser/EsqlBaseParserVisitor.java
@fang-xing-esql fang-xing-esql added auto-merge-without-approval Automatically merge pull request when CI checks pass (NB doesn't wait for reviews!) test-release Trigger CI checks against release build and removed v9.0.1 labels Feb 24, 2025
@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine merged commit 2de65d0 into elastic:9.0 Feb 24, 2025
16 checks passed
@fang-xing-esql fang-xing-esql deleted the backport/9.0/pr-122075 branch February 24, 2025 22:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

auto-merge-without-approval Automatically merge pull request when CI checks pass (NB doesn't wait for reviews!) backport test-release Trigger CI checks against release build

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants