-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 25.6k
Align merging defaults with Lucene's new defaults. #133946
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
jpountz
wants to merge
11
commits into
elastic:main
Choose a base branch
from
jpountz:update_merging_defaults
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e2aaa81
Align merging defaults with Lucene's new defaults.
jpountz 9e4b054
Update docs/changelog/133946.yaml
jpountz 6b3bb74
changelog
jpountz 8fb9eca
Fix test failure
jpountz c94c94b
Merge branch 'main' into update_merging_defaults
jpountz 713ee92
Merge branch 'main' into update_merging_defaults
jpountz 30af1e6
Merge branch 'main' into update_merging_defaults
joegallo 7d7dbfe
[CI] Update transport version definitions
323c767
Merge branch 'main' into update_merging_defaults
joegallo 774ee44
Merge branch 'main' into update_merging_defaults
henningandersen af939b7
Merge branch 'main' into update_merging_defaults
henningandersen File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ | ||
| pr: 133946 | ||
| summary: Merging is now more aggressive by default, especially for segments under 16MB. | ||
| area: Engine | ||
| type: enhancement | ||
| issues: | ||
| - 120624 | ||
| - 129764 | ||
| - 130328 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This can potentially cause serverless tests to fail though I'd expect the PR build to catch that (looks like it successfully ran serverless tests). We saw that when the lucene default changed. Perhaps we can run one more CI run (to get another randomized sample)?