Skip to content

Conversation

@craigtaverner
Copy link
Contributor

@craigtaverner craigtaverner commented Oct 24, 2025

These tests do not reproduce, even with reported random seeds. We are unmuting them in the hope that the additional logging will bring some clarity to the situations under which they fail.

Of note is that there are 186 tests that have warnings specified, but only 8 issues reported grouped into the following test classes:

  • EsqlSpecIT - 1 issue
  • MultiClusterSpectIT - 3 issues
  • GenerativeForkIT - 4 issues

Five of the eight were related to parsing invalid geospatial types, the other three were change_point, fuse and space-negative.

Six of the eight were reported on main:

Fixes #136249
Fixes #135455
Fixes #134635
Fixes #134254
Fixes #134104
Fixes #133334

Two issues were only muted on 9.2, so we should unmute in the backport: #136285 and #136068

These tests do not reproduce, even with reported random seeds. We are unmuting them in the hope that the additional logging will bring some clarity to the situation under which they fail.
@craigtaverner craigtaverner added >test Issues or PRs that are addressing/adding tests Team:Analytics Meta label for analytical engine team (ESQL/Aggs/Geo) :Analytics/ES|QL AKA ESQL labels Oct 24, 2025
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-analytical-engine (Team:Analytics)

contextBuilder.append("...(truncated)");
}
contextBuilder.append("\n");
return contextBuilder.toString();
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just in case you're wondering, I've tested this multiple times by deliberately messing with the tests expected warnings, and I do see meaningful stuff being printed here in the error messages. Whether that will clarify the flakiness or not is yet to be seen.

Copy link

@cimequinox cimequinox left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change unmutes 6 muted tests and adds additional context to several
warning assertions as described.

@craigtaverner craigtaverner added v9.2.0 auto-backport Automatically create backport pull requests when merged labels Oct 24, 2025
@craigtaverner craigtaverner merged commit 4ef7757 into elastic:main Oct 24, 2025
34 checks passed
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

💔 Backport failed

Status Branch Result
9.2 Commit could not be cherrypicked due to conflicts

You can use sqren/backport to manually backport by running backport --upstream elastic/elasticsearch --pr 137089

craigtaverner added a commit to craigtaverner/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2025
…astic#137089)

These tests do not reproduce, even with reported random seeds. We are unmuting them in the hope that the additional logging will bring some clarity to the situation under which they fail.
@craigtaverner
Copy link
Contributor Author

Manual backport at #137107

elasticsearchmachine pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2025
…37089) (#137107)

These tests do not reproduce, even with reported random seeds. We are unmuting them in the hope that the additional logging will bring some clarity to the situation under which they fail.
fzowl pushed a commit to voyage-ai/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2025
…astic#137089)

These tests do not reproduce, even with reported random seeds. We are unmuting them in the hope that the additional logging will bring some clarity to the situation under which they fail.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment