Upgrade k8s version to v1.23.0

[ChrsMark]

What does this PR do?

This PR upgrades k8s version for the CI to a latest one (v1.23.0)

[elasticmachine]

Pinging @elastic/integrations (Team:Integrations)

[mtojek]

Please wait for the CI to finish.

[elasticmachine]

💔 Build Failed

the below badges are clickable and redirect to their specific view in the CI or DOCS

Expand to view the summary

Build stats

• Start Time: 2021-12-22T10:39:25.977+0000

• Duration: 103 min 9 sec

• Commit: 080624b

Test stats 🧪

Test	Results
Failed	0
Passed	3681
Skipped	5
Total	3686

Steps errors

Expand to view the steps failures

Test integration: gcp

• Took 8 min 13 sec . View more details here
• Description: eval "$(../../build/elastic-package stack shellinit)" ../../build/elastic-package test -v --report-format xUnit --report-output file --test-coverage

🤖 GitHub comments

To re-run your PR in the CI, just comment with:

• /test : Re-trigger the build.

[ChrsMark]

@mtojek any ides about the CI failure? It seems to be an issue in GCP integration.

[mtojek]

I checked internal logs for GCP in the special bucket:

�[35mgcppubsub-vpcflow_1   |�[0m {"level":"debug","ts":"2021-12-22T11:17:42.223Z","caller":"command/log.go:74","msg":"Sending log line.","address":"gcppubsub-emulator:8681","log":"/sample_logs/vpcflow.log","line_number":33}
�[35mgcppubsub-vpcflow_1   |�[0m {"level":"debug","ts":"2021-12-22T11:17:42.246Z","caller":"command/log.go:74","msg":"Sending log line.","address":"gcppubsub-emulator:8681","log":"/sample_logs/vpcflow.log","line_number":34}
�[35mgcppubsub-vpcflow_1   |�[0m {"level":"debug","ts":"2021-12-22T11:17:42.250Z","caller":"command/log.go:74","msg":"Sending log line.","address":"gcppubsub-emulator:8681","log":"/sample_logs/vpcflow.log","line_number":35}
�[35mgcppubsub-vpcflow_1   |�[0m {"level":"debug","ts":"2021-12-22T11:17:42.254Z","caller":"command/log.go:74","msg":"Sending log line.","address":"gcppubsub-emulator:8681","log":"/sample_logs/vpcflow.log","line_number":36}
�[33mgcppubsub-emulator_1  |�[0m [pubsub] Dec 22, 2021 11:17:41 AM io.gapi.emulators.netty.HttpVersionRoutingHandler channelRead
�[33mgcppubsub-emulator_1  |�[0m [pubsub] INFO: Detected HTTP/2 connection.
�[33mgcppubsub-emulator_1  |�[0m [pubsub] Dec 22, 2021 11:17:42 AM io.gapi.emulators.netty.HttpVersionRoutingHandler channelRead
�[33mgcppubsub-emulator_1  |�[0m [pubsub] INFO: Detected HTTP/2 connection.
�[33mgcppubsub-emulator_1  |�[0m [pubsub] Dec 22, 2021 11:17:42 AM io.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline onUnhandledInboundException
�[33mgcppubsub-emulator_1  |�[0m [pubsub] WARNING: An exceptionCaught() event was fired, and it reached at the tail of the pipeline. It usually means the last handler in the pipeline did not handle the exception.
�[33mgcppubsub-emulator_1  |�[0m [pubsub] java.io.IOException: Connection reset by peer
�[33mgcppubsub-emulator_1  |�[0m [pubsub] 	at java.base/sun.nio.ch.FileDispatcherImpl.read0(Native Method)
�[33mgcppubsub-emulator_1  |�[0m [pubsub] 	at java.base/sun.nio.ch.SocketDispatcher.read(SocketDispatcher.java:39)
�[33mgcppubsub-emulator_1  |�[0m [pubsub] 	at java.base/sun.nio.ch.IOUtil.readIntoNativeBuffer(IOUtil.java:276)
�[33mgcppubsub-emulator_1  |�[0m [pubsub] 	at java.base/sun.nio.ch.IOUtil.read(IOUtil.java:233)
�[33mgcppubsub-emulator_1  |�[0m [pubsub] 	at java.base/sun.nio.ch.IOUtil.read(IOUtil.java:223)
�[33mgcppubsub-emulator_1  |�[0m [pubsub] 	at java.base/sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.read(SocketChannelImpl.java:356)
�[33mgcppubsub-emulator_1  |�[0m [pubsub] 	at io.netty.buffer.PooledByteBuf.setBytes(PooledByteBuf.java:253)
�[33mgcppubsub-emulator_1  |�[0m [pubsub] 	at io.netty.buffer.AbstractByteBuf.writeBytes(AbstractByteBuf.java:1133)
�[33mgcppubsub-emulator_1  |�[0m [pubsub] 	at io.netty.channel.socket.nio.NioSocketChannel.doReadBytes(NioSocketChannel.java:350)
�[33mgcppubsub-emulator_1  |�[0m [pubsub] 	at io.netty.channel.nio.AbstractNioByteChannel$NioByteUnsafe.read(AbstractNioByteChannel.java:151)
�[33mgcppubsub-emulator_1  |�[0m [pubsub] 	at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKey(NioEventLoop.java:714)
�[33mgcppubsub-emulator_1  |�[0m [pubsub] 	at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKeysOptimized(NioEventLoop.java:650)
�[33mgcppubsub-emulator_1  |�[0m [pubsub] 	at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKeys(NioEventLoop.java:576)
�[33mgcppubsub-emulator_1  |�[0m [pubsub] 	at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.run(NioEventLoop.java:493)
�[33mgcppubsub-emulator_1  |�[0m [pubsub] 	at io.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor$4.run(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:989)
�[33mgcppubsub-emulator_1  |�[0m [pubsub] 	at io.netty.util.internal.ThreadExecutorMap$2.run(ThreadExecutorMap.java:74)
�[33mgcppubsub-emulator_1  |�[0m [pubsub] 	at io.netty.util.concurrent.FastThreadLocalRunnable.run(FastThreadLocalRunnable.java:30)
�[33mgcppubsub-emulator_1  |�[0m [pubsub] 	at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
�[33mgcppubsub-emulator_1  |�[0m [pubsub] 
�[35mgcppubsub-vpcflow_1   |�[0m {"level":"debug","ts":"2021-12-22T11:17:42.258Z","caller":"command/log.go:74","msg":"Sending log line.","address":"gcppubsub-emulator:8681","log":"/sample_logs/vpcflow.log","line_number":37}
�[35mgcppubsub-vpcflow_1   |�[0m {"level":"debug","ts":"2021-12-22T11:17:42.262Z","caller":"command/log.go:74","msg":"Sending log line.","address":"gcppubsub-emulator:8681","log":"/sample_logs/vpcflow.log","line_number":38}

It doesn't look like a related bug, so I would say we can safely merge this change. AFAIR kind is used by the Kubernetes integration only. Would you like me to merge this PR?

[ChrsMark]

Thanks for checking, I will proceed with the merge.

update: May your admin rights are needed here cause I cannot merge without green CI.