[DOCS] Consider expanding table for mapped fields #2098
Description
There's a lot of repetition in this and the next three tables, so the more important info (A is mapped to B) gets lost in a lot of text.
Would it be possible to add a column for "Mapped field" for all of these tables? That would relieve some of the repetition of "Mapped to the XXX yyy field" in every line, and it'd be instantly clear what is mapped to what. I know our narrow page margins make tables difficult, but maybe just one more column could still work...?
Originally posted by @joepeeples in #2048 (comment)