Skip to content

Conversation

@benironside
Copy link
Contributor

@benironside benironside commented Nov 12, 2024

Serverless twin of #6064

@benironside benironside self-assigned this Nov 12, 2024
@benironside benironside requested a review from a team as a code owner November 12, 2024 00:14
@benironside benironside added the Docset: Serverless Issues for Serverless Security label Nov 12, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link

A documentation preview will be available soon.

Request a new doc build by commenting
  • Rebuild this PR: run docs-build
  • Rebuild this PR and all Elastic docs: run docs-build rebuild

run docs-build is much faster than run docs-build rebuild. A rebuild should only be needed in rare situations.

If your PR continues to fail for an unknown reason, the doc build pipeline may be broken. Elastic employees can check the pipeline status here.

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Nov 12, 2024

This pull request does not have a backport label. Could you fix it @benironside? 🙏
To fixup this pull request, you need to add the backport labels for the needed
branches, such as:

  • v7.x is the label to automatically backport to the 7.x branch.
  • v7./d./d is the label to automatically backport to the 7./d branch. /d is the digit

NOTE: backport-skip has been added to this pull request.

Copy link
Contributor

@nastasha-solomon nastasha-solomon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lot's of great, new content here. Just left a few corrections. Looks good as a whole!

Co-authored-by: Nastasha Solomon <79124755+nastasha-solomon@users.noreply.github.com>
@benironside benironside merged commit 7f4f23b into main Nov 12, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport-skip Docset: Serverless Issues for Serverless Security

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants