typo

[MatthieuMordrel]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated the migration guide from Fastify with improved wording for clarity and readability.
  • Corrected minor grammatical issues to make instructions easier to follow.
  • No changes to functionality or behavior; this update affects documentation text only.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

A single documentation sentence in docs/migrate/from-fastify.md was updated to correct grammar, changing phrasing without affecting meaning. No code, APIs, or behavior were modified.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Change Summary
Docs grammar fix docs/migrate/from-fastify.md	Corrected grammar in one sentence (“doesn't has” → “doesn't have”; “offers by” → “offered by”). No functional or behavioral changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

I nibble commas, hop past verbs so brave,
Tuck stray letters into a tidy cave.
With whisker-proofreads and carrot flair,
I fix the phrasing here and there.
Now the docs read smooth—hip hop, hurray!

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title Check	❓ Inconclusive	The title "typo" is technically related to the pull request's content, as the change does fix typos and grammar errors in the documentation. However, the title is extremely vague and generic, failing to provide meaningful context about the changeset. A teammate reviewing the repository history would see only "typo" without understanding which specific typos were fixed, which file was affected, or what the corrections entailed. The instructions specifically identify such non-descriptive terms as falling into the inconclusive category, as they don't convey useful information despite being factually accurate.	Consider revising the title to be more descriptive and specific, such as "Fix grammar in fastify migration docs" or "Fix typos in migration documentation" to provide clearer context about what was changed and where. This would help teammates quickly understand the nature of the fix without needing to review the full diff.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3d2186d and 6d2cd18.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/migrate/from-fastify.md (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 LanguageTool

docs/migrate/from-fastify.md

[grammar] ~1449-~1449: Use a hyphen to join words.
Context: ...end-to-end type safety** offered by next generation framework. If you are lookin...

(QB_NEW_EN_HYPHEN)

[coderabbitai]

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Polish the concluding sentence grammar

The revised sentence still reads awkwardly (“established framework,” “sounds type safety,” missing hyphen). Please tweak the wording to keep the grammar tight.

- Elysia offers a more ergonomic and developer-friendly experience with a focus on performance, type safety, and simplicity while Fastify is one of the established framework for Node.js, but doesn't have **sounds type safety** and **end-to-end type safety** offered by next generation framework.
+ Elysia offers a more ergonomic and developer-friendly experience with a focus on performance, type safety, and simplicity, while Fastify remains one of the established frameworks for Node.js but lacks **sound type safety** and **end-to-end type safety** offered by next-generation frameworks.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

	Elysia offers a more ergonomic and developer-friendly experience with a focus on performance, type safety, and simplicity while Fastify is one of the established framework for Node.js, but doesn't have **sounds type safety** and **end-to-end type safety** offered by next generation framework.
	Elysia offers a more ergonomic and developer-friendly experience with a focus on performance, type safety, and simplicity, while Fastify remains one of the established frameworks for Node.js but lacks **sound type safety** and **end-to-end type safety** offered by next-generation frameworks.

🧰 Tools

🪛 LanguageTool

[grammar] ~1449-~1449: Use a hyphen to join words.
Context: ...end-to-end type safety** offered by next generation framework. If you are lookin...

(QB_NEW_EN_HYPHEN)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In docs/migrate/from-fastify.md around line 1449, the concluding sentence is
grammatically awkward: it needs "an established framework", "sound" (not
"sounds") type safety, and a hyphen in "end-to-end". Replace the sentence with a
grammatically correct version that uses "an established Node.js framework" and
"sound end-to-end type safety" (or "strong type safety"), includes the missing
hyphen, and keeps the contrast clear and concise (e.g., mention Elysia's
ergonomic, developer-friendly experience focused on performance, type safety,
and simplicity versus Fastify as an established Node.js framework that does not
provide the same sound end-to-end type safety).