Skip to content
Peter Desmet edited this page Sep 21, 2023 · 13 revisions

Finland

General comments

  • Generally looks good, some rain contamination but not much. Densities seem reasonable according to what we have seen before, except for high north (filou), but this is to be expected./CN19

  • 2014-2017: Generally good densities, but dealiasing fails in many (most?) cases given low unambiguous velocity of Finnish data. Velocities and directions and consequently MTRs must be interpreted cautiously. Same problem in all data checked up to 2021. Will persist as long as velocities are processed the same. /NW

Parameters

0: not available, 1: available, 2: poor quality, 3: good quality

param quality remarks
DBZH 1
TH 1
VRADH 1
CCORH 0
RHOHV 0
PHIDP 0
ZDR 0

Volume coverage pattern

scan.number how.highprf how.lowprf where.elangle where.nbins where.nrays where.rscale params

Radar overview

radar type radar end date remarks
fianj C active
fiika C active
fikes C active
fikor C active
fikuo C active
filuo C active
fipet C active
fiuta C active
fivan C active
fivim C active

Radar details

fianj

fiika

fikes

fikor

fikuo

filuo

Radar at very high latitude: very few bird movements and, some rain contamination. Time window evaluated was probably too late in season for this site. /CN19

fipet

fiuta

fivan

fivim

  • Home
  • Countries:
    • Austria (at)
    • Belgium (be)
    • Croatia (hr)
    • Czech Republic (cz)
    • Denmark (dk)
    • Estonia (ee)
    • Finland (fi)
    • France (fr)
    • Germany (de)
    • Israel (il)
    • Netherlands (nl)
    • Norway (no)
    • Poland (pl)
    • Portugal (pt)
    • Slovakia (sk)
    • Slovenia (si)
    • Spain (es)
    • Sweden (se)
    • Switzerland (ch)
    • United Kingdom (uk)
  • Template (temp)
Clone this wiki locally