Repository navigation
Speculative Namespaces
enumeratio edited this page Sep 29, 2026
·
1 revision
Speculative design. Open, not settled — thinking and proposals, not shipped behavior. See Roadmap for what's in flight.
Split from Namespaces: §7 Open.
- String identifier vs context path. §4 argues for the path on promotion-cost grounds. Not settled, and the cheapest moment to settle it is now.
-
Which separator character. §3.3 — only
_is legal today and it collides with the subscript convention.~is semantically right and currently taken by LaTeX. - Where the frontier sits. §6.1 — the primitive set is a decision, and everything in §6 depends on it.
- Does a resolved resource keep identity across sessions? Wolfram resources have a UUID behind the name. If promotion is a rename, something stable underneath has to survive it.
- Where the registry lives. Today it would be extracted enumeratio data committed into notatio. The aspiration is fetched-on-demand. The shape should not assume either.
- The 53 multi-carrier stats need the domain-keyed signature to exist first. The other 189 need only carrier-scoped definitions, which is ours to build; the 53 are a hard dependency on the upstream question pile rather than something we can route around.
- Aggregates are not counted above — they were not in the extraction. They need the same census before being placed in one of the three populations.