Rule 11: Skip PROBE-only bitmap filter predicates#358
Merged
erikdarlingdata merged 1 commit intodevfrom Feb 27, 2026
Merged
Conversation
PROBE() expressions pushed down from hash joins are bitmap filters, not real residual predicates. Rule 11 now ignores scans where the predicate is exclusively PROBE(). When a real predicate exists alongside PROBE (e.g. [col]=(0) AND PROBE(...)), the rule still fires. Adds IsProbeOnly() helper to both Dashboard and Lite PlanAnalyzers. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
[col]=(0) AND PROBE(...)), the rule still firesIsProbeOnly()helper to both Dashboard and Lite PlanAnalyzersTest plan
🤖 Generated with Claude Code