refactor: update eslint dependencies
#190
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
lumirlumir
commented
Aug 25, 2025
| "configFilename": "eslint.config.mjs", | ||
| "devDependencies": [ | ||
| "eslint@>=9.27.0", | ||
| "eslint@>=9.33.0", |
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This line was updated due to a CI failure, as the upstream eslint-config-xo has updated its devDependencies to eslint@>=9.33.0.
Ref: #186
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prerequisites checklist
What is the purpose of this pull request?
Hi,
In this PR, I've updated the
eslintdependencies to the latest versions.The
iflag was detected by the newly addedeslint-plugin-regexpdependency, so I removed it. Since there are no alphabetic characters in the regex, I believe the behavior should remain the same.What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
Related Issues
Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?