Skip to content

Conversation

@xxDTECHxx
Copy link
Contributor

@xxDTECHxx xxDTECHxx commented Aug 3, 2025

This PR adds the Pepe Community ($PEPE) token to the Superchain Token List for Ethereum and Base.

  • L1 Address: 0xbe042e9d09cb588331ff911c2b46fd833a3e5bd6
  • L2 Address (Base): 0xb5068ad7e4ad8f7fe2fcf5abe2c043ab8866569c
  • Project Name: Pepe Community
  • Symbol: PEPE
  • Decimals: 18
  • Website: https://pepecommunity.vip
  • Token logo included as logo.svg

Deployment on Base will follow the standard OptimismMintableERC20Factory process as recommended by Base bridging documentation. (This was completed and now the L2 Address for Base was populated above. )

@xxDTECHxx xxDTECHxx requested a review from a team as a code owner August 3, 2025 18:57
@wiz-inc-a178a98b5d
Copy link

wiz-inc-a178a98b5d bot commented Aug 3, 2025

Wiz Scan Summary

Scanner Findings
Vulnerability Finding Vulnerabilities -
Data Finding Sensitive Data 1 Low
Secret Finding Secrets -
IaC Misconfiguration IaC Misconfigurations -
Total 1 Low

View scan details in Wiz

To detect these findings earlier in the dev lifecycle, try using Wiz Code VS Code Extension.

"address": "0xbe042e9d09cb588331ff911c2b46fd833a3e5bd6"
},
"base": {
"address": "0xPUT_YOUR_BASE_DEPLOYED_ADDRESS_HERE"
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

0xb5068ad7e4ad8f7fe2fcf5abe2c043ab8866569c

@fainashalts
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @xxDTECHxx your PR is failing, I think likely because it doesn't contain the actual address on Base. Please fix and feel free to tag me when done for a re-review!

@xxDTECHxx
Copy link
Contributor Author

xxDTECHxx commented Aug 13, 2025

@fainashalts Hey there!
I did update the json to reflect the base contract created. the ci/cicleci: token validation continues to fail due to symbol collision. Created a folder named PEPE_COMMUNITY since PEPE data folder was already taken.

@xxDTECHxx
Copy link
Contributor Author

@fainashalts checking in if you are able to assist now! Thank you!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Low Sensitive Data Finding

Financial

More Details
Attribute Value
Data Classifier Financial/Ethereum Address
Data Classifier ID BUILTIN-388

Sampled Examples

Key Value
ethereum.address 0x*42...**d6 (42 chars)

Rule ID: BUILTIN-388


To ignore this finding as an exception, reply to this conversation with #wiz_ignore reason

If you'd like to ignore this finding in all future scans, add an exception in the .wiz file (learn more) or create an Ignore Rule (learn more).

@fainashalts
Copy link
Contributor

HI @xxDTECHxx thank you so much for your patience - we had an issue with rate limiting which I just fixed. Can you rebase this PR against master? I'm pretty sure it will pass CICD after you do that and then I can merge!

@xxDTECHxx
Copy link
Contributor Author

@fainashalts artifact errors in Circle CI validate show timeout on infura again.

@fainashalts
Copy link
Contributor

HI @xxDTECHxx it looks like your branch is stale - you have to rebase against the latest master to get my fix. Thanks, let me know when this is done and we can get this merged!

@xxDTECHxx xxDTECHxx closed this Aug 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants