Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 17, 2021. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@subramanianv
Copy link
Contributor

closes #95

@subramanianv
Copy link
Contributor Author

@holgerd77 See #100

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.03%) to 99.16% when pulling aecb58a on subramanianv:zeroAddress into 05f0cef on ethereumjs:master.

@subramanianv
Copy link
Contributor Author

follow up from #99

Copy link
Member

@holgerd77 holgerd77 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, great, thanks!

@holgerd77 holgerd77 merged commit 926f2d7 into ethereumjs:master Oct 24, 2017
@subramanianv subramanianv deleted the zeroAddress branch October 24, 2017 20:06
@subramanianv subramanianv restored the zeroAddress branch October 24, 2017 20:06
@subramanianv subramanianv deleted the zeroAddress branch October 24, 2017 20:44
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Function to check if the address is a Zero Address

3 participants