Skip to content

Conversation

@sirkonst
Copy link
Contributor

Very useful for me :-)

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 12, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-1.9%) to 98.123% when pulling 042a795 on sirkonst:feature/singleton_per_thread into 1c47f73 on ets-labs:master.

@rmk135
Copy link
Member

rmk135 commented Aug 12, 2016

Hello,

Just wanted to say "Thanks". I will take a look a bit latter.

Roman

@rmk135
Copy link
Member

rmk135 commented Aug 18, 2016

Hello Konstantin,

I've reworked a bit your idea and merged it in terms of PR #132. Also I've added a special section in documentation about using singletons in multi-threading applications.

I productized new version with number 2.1.0 (http://python-dependency-injector.ets-labs.org/en/stable/main/changelog.html) and it's been available on PyPi (https://pypi.python.org/pypi/dependency_injector/2.1.0), so you're welcome to upgrade.

PS: Thanks a lot for your contribution, I have added you in a list of contributors (https://github.com/ets-labs/python-dependency-injector/blob/master/CONTRIBUTORS.rst). Hope you are fine with that ;)

Thanks,
Roman

@rmk135 rmk135 closed this Aug 18, 2016
@sirkonst
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks! Great library!

@sirkonst sirkonst deleted the feature/singleton_per_thread branch August 22, 2016 12:33
@rmk135
Copy link
Member

rmk135 commented Aug 22, 2016

Thank you 😊

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants