Update mdformat dependency to accommodate 1.0.0 version bump.

[alec-bike]

Describe the bug

mdformat just bumped their version to 1.0.0 -- this falls outside the mdformat-footnote dependency range mdformat>=0.7.8,<0.8.0.

Request: update version range for mdformat to accommodate the new version.

Reproduce the bug

❯ uv tool install mdformat@1.0.0 -w mdformat-footnote -w mdformat-mkdocs
  × No solution found when resolving dependencies:
  ╰─▶ Because only the following versions of mdformat-footnote are available:
          mdformat-footnote==0.0.2
          mdformat-footnote==0.0.3
          mdformat-footnote==0.0.4
          mdformat-footnote==0.1.0
          mdformat-footnote==0.1.1
      and mdformat-footnote<=0.0.4 depends on mdformat>=0.5.3,<0.6.0, we can conclude that mdformat-footnote<0.1.0 depends on mdformat>=0.5.3,<0.6.0.
      And because mdformat-footnote==0.1.0 depends on mdformat>=0.7.0,<0.8.0 and mdformat>=0.7.8,<0.8.0, we can conclude that all versions of
      mdformat-footnote depend on one of:
          mdformat>=0.5.3,<0.6.0
          mdformat>=0.7.0,<0.8.0

      And because you require mdformat==1.0.0 and mdformat-footnote, we can conclude that your requirements are unsatisfiable.

List your environment

No response

[alec-bike]

I cloned mdformat-footnote, removed the upper bound on the mdformat version and tested locally with mdformat@1.0.0. Works fine.

[KyleKing]

This repository is missing a secret in order to support publishing. I'll see what I can do about sorting that out

[KyleKing]

Requested credentials here: https://github.com/orgs/executablebooks/discussions/1196#discussioncomment-14719728 🤞🏻

[gaige]

With the update to using secure publishing, the credentials should no longer be necessary. Looks like re-tagging v0.1.2 resulted in the expected publication. Thanks for raising this issue.