[CI] Use constant commit sha#20828
Merged
acdlite merged 1 commit intofacebook:masterfrom Feb 16, 2021
Merged
Conversation
When running the publish workflow, either via the command line or via the daily cron job, we should use a constant SHA instead of whatever happens to be at the head of the main branch at the time the workflow is run. The difference is subtle: currently, the SHA is read at runtime, each time the workflow is run. With this change, the SHA is read right before the workflow is created and passed in as a constant parameter. In practical terms, this means if a workflow is re-run via the CircleCI web UI, it will always re-run using the same commit SHA as the original workflow, instead of fetching the latest SHA from GitHub, which may have changed. Also avoids a race condition where the head SHA changes in between the Next publish job and the Experimental publish job.
|
Comparing: 6f88438...322aa28 Critical size changesIncludes critical production bundles, as well as any change greater than 2%:
Significant size changesIncludes any change greater than 0.2%: (No significant changes) |
gaearon
approved these changes
Feb 16, 2021
koto
pushed a commit
to koto/react
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 15, 2021
When running the publish workflow, either via the command line or via the daily cron job, we should use a constant SHA instead of whatever happens to be at the head of the main branch at the time the workflow is run. The difference is subtle: currently, the SHA is read at runtime, each time the workflow is run. With this change, the SHA is read right before the workflow is created and passed in as a constant parameter. In practical terms, this means if a workflow is re-run via the CircleCI web UI, it will always re-run using the same commit SHA as the original workflow, instead of fetching the latest SHA from GitHub, which may have changed. Also avoids a race condition where the head SHA changes in between the Next publish job and the Experimental publish job.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When running the publish workflow, either via the command line or via the daily cron job, we should use a constant SHA instead of whatever happens to be at the head of the main branch at the time the workflow is run.
The difference is subtle: currently, the SHA is read at runtime, each time the workflow is run. With this change, the SHA is read right before the workflow is created and passed in as a constant parameter.
In practical terms, this means if a workflow is re-run via the CircleCI web UI, it will always re-run using the same commit SHA as the original workflow, instead of fetching the latest SHA from GitHub, which may have changed.
Also avoids a race condition where the head SHA changes in between the Next publish job and the Experimental publish job.