[compiler] Kill markReactiveIdentifier and friends #31178
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Summary: With the previous PR we no longer need to mark identifiers as reactive in contexts where we don't have places. We already deleted most uses of markReactiveId; the last case was to track identifiers through loadlocals etc -- but we already use a disjoint alias map that accounts for loadlocals when setting reactivity. [ghstack-poisoned]
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
mvitousek
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 10, 2024
Summary: With the previous PR we no longer need to mark identifiers as reactive in contexts where we don't have places. We already deleted most uses of markReactiveId; the last case was to track identifiers through loadlocals etc -- but we already use a disjoint alias map that accounts for loadlocals when setting reactivity. ghstack-source-id: d4ef8f1 Pull Request resolved: #31178
Summary: With the previous PR we no longer need to mark identifiers as reactive in contexts where we don't have places. We already deleted most uses of markReactiveId; the last case was to track identifiers through loadlocals etc -- but we already use a disjoint alias map that accounts for loadlocals when setting reactivity. [ghstack-poisoned]
mvitousek
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 12, 2024
Summary: With the previous PR we no longer need to mark identifiers as reactive in contexts where we don't have places. We already deleted most uses of markReactiveId; the last case was to track identifiers through loadlocals etc -- but we already use a disjoint alias map that accounts for loadlocals when setting reactivity. ghstack-source-id: 69ce0a7 Pull Request resolved: #31178
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
Summary:
With the previous PR we no longer need to mark identifiers as reactive in contexts where we don't have places. We already deleted most uses of markReactiveId; the last case was to track identifiers through loadlocals etc -- but we already use a disjoint alias map that accounts for loadlocals when setting reactivity.