Skip to content

Conversation

@josephsavona
Copy link
Member

@josephsavona josephsavona commented Nov 21, 2024

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

We didn't originally support holes within array patterns, so DCE was only able to prune unused items from the end of an array pattern. Now that we support holes we can replace any unused item with a hole, and then just prune the items to the last identifier/spread entry.

Note: this was motivated by finding useState where either the state or setState go unused — both are strong indications that you're violating the rules in some way. By DCE-ing the unused portions of the useState destructuring we can easily check if you're ignoring either value.

We didn't originally support holes within array patterns, so DCE was only able to prune unused items from the end of an array pattern. Now that we support holes we can replace any unused item with a hole, and then just prune the items to the last identifier/spread entry.

Note: this was motivated by finding useState where either the state or setState go unused — both are strong indications that you're violating the rules in some way. By DCE-ing the unused portions of the useState destructuring we can easily check if you're ignoring either value.

[ghstack-poisoned]
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 21, 2024

Deployment failed with the following error:

You don't have permission to create a Preview Deployment for this project.

View Documentation: https://vercel.com/docs/accounts/team-members-and-roles

josephsavona added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2024
We didn't originally support holes within array patterns, so DCE was only able to prune unused items from the end of an array pattern. Now that we support holes we can replace any unused item with a hole, and then just prune the items to the last identifier/spread entry.

Note: this was motivated by finding useState where either the state or setState go unused — both are strong indications that you're violating the rules in some way. By DCE-ing the unused portions of the useState destructuring we can easily check if you're ignoring either value.

ghstack-source-id: 0721ece
Pull Request resolved: #31603
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added CLA Signed React Core Team Opened by a member of the React Core Team labels Nov 21, 2024
… DCE"

We didn't originally support holes within array patterns, so DCE was only able to prune unused items from the end of an array pattern. Now that we support holes we can replace any unused item with a hole, and then just prune the items to the last identifier/spread entry.

Note: this was motivated by finding useState where either the state or setState go unused — both are strong indications that you're violating the rules in some way. By DCE-ing the unused portions of the useState destructuring we can easily check if you're ignoring either value.

[ghstack-poisoned]
josephsavona added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2024
We didn't originally support holes within array patterns, so DCE was only able to prune unused items from the end of an array pattern. Now that we support holes we can replace any unused item with a hole, and then just prune the items to the last identifier/spread entry.

Note: this was motivated by finding useState where either the state or setState go unused — both are strong indications that you're violating the rules in some way. By DCE-ing the unused portions of the useState destructuring we can easily check if you're ignoring either value.

ghstack-source-id: f13c5cc
Pull Request resolved: #31603
Copy link
Contributor

@mofeiZ mofeiZ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA Signed React Core Team Opened by a member of the React Core Team

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants