-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 49.9k
[compiler][snap] Support pattern of files to test as CLI argument #35148
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
josephsavona
wants to merge
4
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
pr35148
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Destructing statements that start off as declarations can end up becoming reassignments if the variable is a scope declaration, so we have existing logic to handle cases where some parts of a destructure need to be converted into new locals, with a reassignment to the hoisted scope variable afterwards. However, there is an edge case where all of the values are reassigned, in which case we don't need to rewrite and can just set the instruction kind to reassign.
The next PR needs to check if a block is controlled by a value derived from a ref.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
11570e1 to
097d6c5
Compare
Member
Author
|
Anyone else who comments with "AI PR review" spam is also going to get instantly banned from the repo. |
cf0c7d5 to
e890a5b
Compare
…conditionals Conditionally calling setState in an effect is sometimes necessary, but should generally follow the pattern of using a "previous vaue" ref to manually compare and ensure that the setState is idempotent. See fixture for an example.
e890a5b to
5dc6c3b
Compare
I've been trying out LLM agents for compiler development, and one thing i found is that the agent naturally wants to run `yarn snap <pattern>` to test a specific fixture, and I want to be able to tell it (directly or in rules/skills) to do this in order to get the debug output from all the compiler passes. Agents can figure out our current testfilter.txt file system but that's just tedious. So here we add support for `yarn snap -p <pattern>`. If you pass in a pattern with an extension, we target that extension specifically. If you pass in a .expect.md file, we look at that specific fixture. And if the pattern doesn't have extensions, we search for `<pattern>{.js,.jsx,.ts,.tsx}`. When patterns are enabled we automatically log as in debug mode (if there is a single match), and disable watch mode.
Open to feedback!
5dc6c3b to
778ea21
Compare
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I've been trying out LLM agents for compiler development, and one thing i found is that the agent naturally wants to run
yarn snap <pattern>to test a specific fixture, and I want to be able to tell it (directly or in rules/skills) to do this in order to get the debug output from all the compiler passes. Agents can figure out our current testfilter.txt file system but that's just tedious. So here we add support foryarn snap -p <pattern>. If you pass in a pattern with an extension, we target that extension specifically. If you pass in a .expect.md file, we look at that specific fixture. And if the pattern doesn't have extensions, we search for<pattern>{.js,.jsx,.ts,.tsx}. When patterns are enabled we automatically log as in debug mode (if there is a single match), and disable watch mode.Open to feedback!
Stack created with Sapling. Best reviewed with ReviewStack.