feat: support custom SITE command

[KirCute]

Allow the caller to customize SITE command.

[fclairamb]

Sorry for the late answer. I'm not too sure about this implementation. Wouldn't it make more sense to make it an interface like everywhere else where we extend the features of the library ?

What do you think @drakkan ?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 72.72727% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 86.44%. Comparing base (6e2547d) to head (87d540e).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
handle_misc.go	72.72%	5 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #522      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.68%   86.44%   -0.25%     
==========================================
  Files          11       11              
  Lines        2328     2338      +10     
==========================================
+ Hits         2018     2021       +3     
- Misses        236      242       +6     
- Partials       74       75       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[fclairamb]

Hi @KirCute what do you think about this implementation #544 ?

[KirCute]

Hi @KirCute what do you think about this implementation #544 ?

I think it's quite good. It looks like more flexible.