Replies: 1 comment
-
|
I'm looking for this same answer. As of yet it seems to accomplish this you'd have to roll your own group by feature which is less than ideal since the built-in group by feature is so nice, but for us it's a show stopper so I'm forced to roll my own. Anyways.. Anybody out there heard anything about this and whether or not there's a reason for it to be the way that it is? Or has it just never been implemented yet? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Package
Table builder
Package Version
v3.2
How can we help you?
The sorting works normally without grouping, but when I use the
->groupsOnly()option to group rows by a field, sorting doesn’t work and the order doesn’t change.Sorting works without groups:

Sorting has no effect when grouped with

->groupsOnly()I assume it sorts elements within the groups, not the groups themselves. Does anyone know how to sort the groups?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions