Skip to content

Conversation

@masih
Copy link
Member

@masih masih commented Jun 5, 2024

Previous iterations of FIP-0086 made use of weak quorum in chain state, but the latest changes no longer require it. The only place that the notion of weak quorum is used is in skipping to future rounds, where it is only needed at quorum state. Hence the unused code removal at chain support.

Fixes #233

Previous iterations of FIP-0086 made use of weak quorum in chain state,
but the latest changes no longer require it. The only place that the
notion of weak quorum is used is in skipping to future rounds, where it
is only needed at quorum state. Hence the unused code removal at chain
support.

Fixes #233
@masih masih requested review from Stebalien and anorth June 5, 2024 13:59
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 5, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.48%. Comparing base (c8532ae) to head (acc4533).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #306      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.33%   85.48%   +0.15%     
==========================================
  Files          14       14              
  Lines        1459     1454       -5     
==========================================
- Hits         1245     1243       -2     
+ Misses        136      133       -3     
  Partials       78       78              
Files Coverage Δ
gpbft/gpbft.go 83.64% <ø> (+0.34%) ⬆️

@Stebalien Stebalien added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 6, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit f0285e6 Jun 6, 2024
@Stebalien Stebalien deleted the masih/rm-cs-weakq branch June 6, 2024 17:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

HasWeakQuorumFor never called

4 participants