Skip to content

fix: lock pydantic version #270

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 3, 2023
Merged

fix: lock pydantic version #270

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 3, 2023

Conversation

@stepansergeevitch
Copy link
Collaborator

@stepansergeevitch stepansergeevitch commented Jul 3, 2023

Lock pydantic version to 1.* to avoid incompatibility issues

@stepansergeevitch stepansergeevitch self-assigned this Jul 3, 2023
@stepansergeevitch stepansergeevitch changed the title lock pydantic version fix: lock pydantic version Jul 3, 2023
@stepansergeevitch stepansergeevitch requested a review from ptiurin July 3, 2023 11:10
ptiurin
ptiurin approved these changes Jul 3, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@ptiurin ptiurin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Otherwise lgtm

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jul 3, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@stepansergeevitch stepansergeevitch merged commit bd55eeb into 0.x Jul 3, 2023
@stepansergeevitch stepansergeevitch deleted the lock-pydantic-version branch July 3, 2023 12:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@ptiurin ptiurin ptiurin approved these changes

Assignees

@stepansergeevitch stepansergeevitch

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@stepansergeevitch @ptiurin