Skip to content

Conversation

@ptiurin
Copy link
Contributor

@ptiurin ptiurin commented Oct 19, 2023

Similar to the change in 1.x, removing trino lock as it affects runs from within asyncio.

Cherry picked from #303

UPD: this does not fix the asyncio runs. Added a test that shows this.

@ptiurin ptiurin requested a review from a team as a code owner October 19, 2023 14:40
@ptiurin
Copy link
Contributor Author

ptiurin commented Oct 19, 2023

Added a failing test that shows we can't run via asyncio.run

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

85.0% 85.0% Coverage
2.8% 2.8% Duplication

warning The version of Java (11.0.14) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it soon. Please update to at least Java 17.
Read more here

Copy link
Contributor Author

@ptiurin ptiurin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice one, lgtm

@stepansergeevitch stepansergeevitch merged commit 088bce2 into 0.x Oct 23, 2023
@stepansergeevitch stepansergeevitch deleted the remove-trino-lock branch October 23, 2023 09:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants