Skip to content

N-11 fix misleading comment with flashtestations spec #39

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 20, 2025
Merged

N-11 fix misleading comment with flashtestations spec #39

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion src/interfaces/IBlockBuilderPolicy.sol
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ interface IBlockBuilderPolicy {
/// @notice This function will only succeed if the caller is a registered TEE-controlled address from an attested TEE
/// and the TEE is running an approved block builder workload (see `addWorkloadToPolicy`)
/// @notice The blockContentHash is a keccak256 hash of a subset of the block header, as specified by the version.
/// See the [flashtestations spec](https://github.com/flashbots/rollup-boost/blob/77fc19f785eeeb9b4eb5fb08463bc556dec2c837/specs/flashtestations.md) for more details
/// See the [flashtestations spec](https://github.com/flashbots/rollup-boost/blob/main/specs/flashtestations.md) for more details
/// @dev If you do not want to deal with the operational difficulties of keeping your TEE-controlled
/// addresses funded, you can use the permitVerifyBlockBuilderProof function instead which costs
/// more gas, but allows any EOA to submit a block builder proof on behalf of a TEE
Expand Down