feat: add option to cli

[ascandone]

No description provided.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This update adds a new global boolean variable to control an experimental account interpolation feature. The variable is initialized via a command-line flag in the getRunCmd function. The run function now checks its state and, if enabled, adds the corresponding experimental flag to the feature flag set. The integration is done by enhancing the existing flag handling mechanism without modifying the overall structure of the code.

Changes

File	Change Summary
internal/cmd/run.go	- Added global variable accountInterpolationFlag - Initialized via a new command-line flag in getRunCmd - Modified run to check the flag and set interpreter.ExperimentalAccountInterpolationFlag in the feature flags

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User
    participant CLI as Command-Line Interface
    participant R as Run Function
    participant F as Feature Flags Map

    U->>CLI: Execute command with experimental flag
    CLI->>R: Initialize accountInterpolationFlag via flag parsing
    R->>R: Evaluate accountInterpolationFlag status
    alt accountInterpolationFlag is true
        R->>F: Add ExperimentalAccountInterpolationFlag to featureFlags
    else
        R->>F: Skip adding experimental flag
    end

Loading

Poem

Oh, how I hop with glee,
A new flag now makes things free,
Account interpolation's on the run,
Toggled by the command-line fun,
CodeRabbit sings a joyful spree,
Hoppin' forward merrily!
🐰✨

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 42f1133 and 6a8fe94.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• internal/cmd/run.go (3 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (4)

internal/cmd/run.go (4)

31-31: New global flag variable added correctly.

The new global variable accountInterpolationFlag is appropriately placed with other similar feature flags, following the same pattern as existing code.

---

129-131: Feature flag implementation looks good.

The conditional check follows the same pattern as other feature flags in the codebase, correctly adding the experimental flag to the featureFlags map when enabled.

---

213-213: Command-line flag implementation is correct.

The flag is properly registered with a clear description explaining the feature's functionality and providing a helpful example. The default value is appropriately set to false for an experimental feature.

---

213-213: Consider adding tests for this new feature.

The implementation of the account interpolation flag looks good, but consider adding tests to verify the flag works correctly and the feature is properly enabled/disabled based on the flag value.

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate Docstrings

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 63.56%. Comparing base (42f1133) to head (6a8fe94).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
internal/cmd/run.go	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #48      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   63.60%   63.56%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          31       31              
  Lines        7100     7104       +4     
==========================================
  Hits         4516     4516              
- Misses       2375     2379       +4     
  Partials      209      209              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.