Skip to content

Conversation

@paul-nicolas
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@paul-nicolas paul-nicolas requested a review from a team as a code owner April 3, 2025 10:04
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 3, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request adjusts the event processing logic in libs/events/index.js by removing the initial parsing of rawBase and instead re-parsing it within the loop for each event. A console.log(aggregated); statement is also added at the end of the function. Additionally, four integration test files for various payment connectors (dummy, generic, reset, and Stripe) have been removed. No changes to exported or public entities were made.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
libs/events/index.js Removed initial parsing of rawBase and reintroduced parsing inside the event loop; added console.log(aggregated); at the end.
tests/integration/.../payments-connectors-(dummy, generic, reset, stripe).go Deleted integration test files for dummy, generic, reset, and Stripe payment connectors.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant AF as Async Function
    participant LP as Loop Processor
    participant BP as Base Parser
    participant CL as Console Logger

    AF->>LP: Iterate over each raw event data
    LP->>BP: Parse rawBase to get base value
    BP-->>LP: Return parsed base
    LP->>LP: Set payload using parsed base for event
    LP->>AF: Add event to aggregated object
    AF->>CL: Log aggregated object at function end
Loading

Suggested labels

components/payments, ee/webhooks

Suggested reviewers

  • flemzord

Poem

I'm a rabbit with code so neat,
Hopping 'round changes that can't be beat.
Parsing anew with every hop,
Integration tests now take a drop.
Cheery logs and clean new start,
CodeRabbit leaps with a joyful heart!
🐰✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1860861 and 62ce63b.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (23)
  • libs/events/generated/all.json is excluded by !**/generated/**, !**/*.json, !**/generated/**
  • libs/events/generated/payments/v2.0.0/CONNECTOR_RESET.json is excluded by !**/generated/**, !**/*.json, !**/generated/**
  • libs/events/generated/payments/v3.0.0/CONNECTOR_RESET.json is excluded by !**/generated/**, !**/*.json, !**/generated/**
  • libs/events/generated/payments/v3.0.0/DELETED_POOL.json is excluded by !**/generated/**, !**/*.json, !**/generated/**
  • libs/events/generated/payments/v3.0.0/SAVED_ACCOUNT.json is excluded by !**/generated/**, !**/*.json, !**/generated/**
  • libs/events/generated/payments/v3.0.0/SAVED_BALANCE.json is excluded by !**/generated/**, !**/*.json, !**/generated/**
  • libs/events/generated/payments/v3.0.0/SAVED_BANK_ACCOUNT.json is excluded by !**/generated/**, !**/*.json, !**/generated/**
  • libs/events/generated/payments/v3.0.0/SAVED_PAYMENT.json is excluded by !**/generated/**, !**/*.json, !**/generated/**
  • libs/events/generated/payments/v3.0.0/SAVED_PAYMENT_INITIATION.json is excluded by !**/generated/**, !**/*.json, !**/generated/**
  • libs/events/generated/payments/v3.0.0/SAVED_PAYMENT_INITIATION_ADJUSTMENT.json is excluded by !**/generated/**, !**/*.json, !**/generated/**
  • libs/events/generated/payments/v3.0.0/SAVED_PAYMENT_INITIATION_RELATED_PAYMENT.json is excluded by !**/generated/**, !**/*.json, !**/generated/**
  • libs/events/generated/payments/v3.0.0/SAVED_POOL.json is excluded by !**/generated/**, !**/*.json, !**/generated/**
  • libs/events/services/payments/v2.0.0/CONNECTOR_RESET.yaml is excluded by !**/*.yaml
  • libs/events/services/payments/v3.0.0/CONNECTOR_RESET.yaml is excluded by !**/*.yaml
  • libs/events/services/payments/v3.0.0/DELETED_POOL.yaml is excluded by !**/*.yaml
  • libs/events/services/payments/v3.0.0/SAVED_ACCOUNT.yaml is excluded by !**/*.yaml
  • libs/events/services/payments/v3.0.0/SAVED_BALANCE.yaml is excluded by !**/*.yaml
  • libs/events/services/payments/v3.0.0/SAVED_BANK_ACCOUNT.yaml is excluded by !**/*.yaml
  • libs/events/services/payments/v3.0.0/SAVED_PAYMENT.yaml is excluded by !**/*.yaml
  • libs/events/services/payments/v3.0.0/SAVED_PAYMENT_INITIATION.yaml is excluded by !**/*.yaml
  • libs/events/services/payments/v3.0.0/SAVED_PAYMENT_INITIATION_ADJUSTMENT.yaml is excluded by !**/*.yaml
  • libs/events/services/payments/v3.0.0/SAVED_PAYMENT_INITIATION_RELATED_PAYMENT.yaml is excluded by !**/*.yaml
  • libs/events/services/payments/v3.0.0/SAVED_POOL.yaml is excluded by !**/*.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • libs/events/index.js (2 hunks)
  • tests/integration/suite/payments-connectors-dummy-pay.go (0 hunks)
  • tests/integration/suite/payments-connectors-generic.go (0 hunks)
  • tests/integration/suite/payments-connectors-reset.go (0 hunks)
  • tests/integration/suite/payments-connectors-stripe.go (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (4)
  • tests/integration/suite/payments-connectors-dummy-pay.go
  • tests/integration/suite/payments-connectors-reset.go
  • tests/integration/suite/payments-connectors-generic.go
  • tests/integration/suite/payments-connectors-stripe.go
🔇 Additional comments (1)
libs/events/index.js (1)

15-15:

❓ Verification inconclusive

Verify behavior after removal of payment integration tests.

With the removal of payment connector integration tests (as indicated by the PR title), these code changes modify how event data is processed. Ensure that this new behavior is still correctly tested through other means.

Since we've removed several integration tests and changed how event data is processed, please verify:

  1. Does the modified event processing still work correctly with payment connectors?
  2. Are there any other tests that cover this functionality now?

Also applies to: 26-26


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any remaining tests that might cover this functionality
echo "Searching for remaining payment connector tests..."
rg -l "payment.*connector" --type=go

Length of output: 196


Ensure that the new event processing behavior is sufficiently covered by existing tests.

I verified that at least one test file, tests/integration/internal/modules/payments.go, still contains references to payment connectors. This indicates that while the original payment integration tests were removed, there remains test coverage for payment connector functionality. Please double-check that these tests comprehensively verify the updated behavior in libs/events/index.js (notably at lines 15 and 26). If you identify any gaps in test coverage or behavior-specific validations, consider adding additional tests to ensure that payment connector interactions continue to work as expected.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@paul-nicolas paul-nicolas changed the base branch from release/v3.0 to main April 3, 2025 10:06
@paul-nicolas paul-nicolas changed the title Feat/remove payment integration tests feat(payments): remove integration tests Apr 3, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Caution

Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments. If you are seeing this consistently it is likely a permissions issue. Please check "Moderation" -> "Code review limits" under your organization settings.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
libs/events/index.js (1)

15-15: Performance consideration: Parsing rawBase on every iteration.

The code now parses rawBase for each event in the innermost loop, rather than parsing it once before the loops. While this ensures each event gets a fresh, independent base object (avoiding potential mutation issues), it introduces redundant parsing operations that could impact performance, especially with many events.

Consider improving performance by parsing rawBase once before the loops and creating a deep copy for each event instead:

- const base = yaml.parse(rawBase);
+ const base = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(baseTemplate));

With baseTemplate defined once before the loops:

const baseTemplate = yaml.parse(rawBase);
🛑 Comments failed to post (1)
libs/events/index.js (1)

26-26: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Remove debugging console.log statement.

This console logging statement appears to be debugging code that was accidentally committed. Logging the entire aggregated object could produce excessive output and potentially impact performance.

- console.log(aggregated);
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.


@paul-nicolas paul-nicolas merged commit 09e47bc into main Apr 3, 2025
7 of 8 checks passed
@paul-nicolas paul-nicolas deleted the feat/remove-payment-integration-tests branch April 3, 2025 11:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants