Skip to content

Conversation

@wpbonelli
Copy link

Fypp docs seem to use .fpp and .fypp interchangeably

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 30, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (0206766) 83.60% compared to head (bea8b0b) 83.60%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1031   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.60%   83.60%           
=======================================
  Files          12       12           
  Lines        2312     2312           
  Branches      205      205           
=======================================
  Hits         1933     1933           
  Misses        374      374           
  Partials        5        5           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@gnikit gnikit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't really understand this PR or the problem it tries to fix. The extensions are already registered. The change in the test folder only affects the tests not the actual extension. I will be closing this PR due to duplication.

Comment on lines +92 to +93
".fpp",
".FPP",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is already present in lines 88-89

@gnikit gnikit closed this Dec 30, 2023
@wpbonelli
Copy link
Author

My mistake, had brief trouble with syntax recognition on an fpp file and did this with no due diligence

@wpbonelli wpbonelli deleted the fypp-exts branch December 30, 2023 15:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants