feat: npm publish anvil, cast and chisel

[grandizzy]

Motivation

Solution

PR Checklist

• Added Tests
• Added Documentation (will add subsequently - @o-az)
• Breaking changes

[guidanoli]

This feature would be very useful to us at cartesi/rollups-contracts. We use Cannon to describe our smart contract deployments, and it runs forge and anvil under-the-hood. If we could have these binaries be distributed and versioned by Node.js project, this would be one less dependency requirement for our devs and users, and we would be able to scope Foundry versions locally! Do you also consider publishing a @foundry-rs/foundry package which includes all these binaries?

[grandizzy]

yes, we could include. Btw forge is already published in npm so you could give ot a try already, this PR tracks publish of the other Foundry artifacts

fixed

[grandizzy]

looking for additional approval as I opened the ticket on behalf of @o-az successful run https://github.com/foundry-rs/foundry/actions/runs/18871258811/job/53850363401 CC @DaniPopes @0xrusowsky @zerosnacks @onbjerg

[0xrusowsky]

i'm not an expert, but i think it looks good.

left some minor cmnts though

[0xrusowsky]

imo it would be nice to centralize all supported platforms in a const with something like:

export const SUPPORTED_PLATFORMS = Object.freeze([
    { platform: 'darwin', arch: 'arm64' },
    { platform: 'darwin', arch: 'amd64' },
    { platform: 'linux', arch: 'arm64' },
    { platform: 'linux', arch: 'amd64' },
    { platform: 'win32', arch: 'amd64' },
  ])

then we could easily add platform validation helpers:

export function isPlatformSupported(platform, arch)

and dynamically generate the CI matrix, ensuring that it is in sync with the supported platforms (rather than manually declaring the huge matrix as we currently do)

[o-az]

planning to address this in a subsequent PR. Specifically, centralizing all references to tools, architectures, etc. in one location vs. in multiple locations.

[grandizzy]

sgtm, @0xrusowsky wdyt?

[0xrusowsky]

np, good for me

[0xrusowsky]

lgtm, pending follow-up PR as discussed.

would be also nice to have another reviewer's approval before merging though