A Python toolkit for evaluating, monitoring, and ensuring the safety of LLM deployments in production.
The problem: 95% of enterprise AI pilots fail to deliver value — not because the models are bad, but because organizations lack the production engineering to deploy them reliably.
The solution: Concrete, runnable tools that address the most common failure modes: hallucination, bias, lack of feedback loops, and operational unreadiness.
pip install llm-production-toolkitFor ML-powered modules (hallucination detection):
pip install llm-production-toolkit[hallucination]For everything:
pip install llm-production-toolkit[all]Evaluate whether LLM output is grounded in source documents. Uses embedding similarity + NLI entailment for robust detection.
llm-toolkit hallucination check \
--output "The Eiffel Tower was built in 1820" \
--source "The Eiffel Tower was constructed from 1887 to 1889 in Paris, France"from llm_production_toolkit.hallucination import GroundingEvaluator
evaluator = GroundingEvaluator()
result = evaluator.evaluate(
llm_output="The Eiffel Tower was built in 1820.",
source_context="The Eiffel Tower was constructed from 1887 to 1889.",
)
print(f"Grounding score: {result.overall_score:.2f}")
print(f"Flagged claims: {len(result.flagged_claims)}")Test any LLM for demographic bias across gender, race, and age using controlled prompt variations.
from llm_production_toolkit.bias import BiasEvaluator
def my_llm(prompt: str) -> str:
# Wrap any LLM — OpenAI, Anthropic, local model, etc.
return call_your_llm(prompt)
evaluator = BiasEvaluator(llm_callable=my_llm, categories=["gender", "race"])
report = evaluator.evaluate(num_runs=3)
print(f"Overall bias score: {report.overall_bias_score:.2f}")Collect and analyze user feedback on LLM outputs. Python API or REST server.
# Start the feedback server
llm-toolkit feedback start --port 8100
# Check metrics
llm-toolkit feedback metrics --window 24from llm_production_toolkit.feedback import FeedbackCollector, FeedbackEntry
collector = FeedbackCollector("feedback.db")
collector.record(FeedbackEntry(
session_id="sess-123",
prompt_hash="abc",
feedback_type="thumbs",
thumbs_value=True,
))
metrics = collector.get_metrics(window_hours=24)
print(f"Satisfaction: {metrics.satisfaction_rate:.1%}")Interactive CLI that scores your LLM deployment's operational maturity across 9 categories.
llm-toolkit readiness assessProduces a readiness score (0-100) with category breakdowns and prioritized recommendations.
Map evaluation results to AI best-practice requirements. Works with any subset of module outputs.
llm-toolkit compliance report \
--readiness readiness.json \
--hallucination grounding.jsonEach module is independently usable with its own CLI and Python API. Optional dependencies keep the core installation small (~5MB). ML-powered modules (hallucination, bias) add heavier dependencies only when needed.
llm-production-toolkit
├── hallucination # Grounding evaluation (requires torch)
├── bias # Demographic bias testing (requires textblob)
├── feedback # Feedback collection (requires fastapi)
├── readiness # Readiness assessment (core deps only)
└── compliance # Compliance mapping (core deps only)
git clone https://github.com/frckeepit/llm-production-toolkit.git
cd llm-production-toolkit
pip install -e ".[dev,all]"
pytest tests/ -m "not slow"
ruff check src/ tests/MIT