Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

3.8 Plugins compatibility #4713

Closed
44 of 62 tasks
afbora opened this issue Sep 28, 2022 · 15 comments
Closed
44 of 62 tasks

3.8 Plugins compatibility #4713

afbora opened this issue Sep 28, 2022 · 15 comments
Assignees

Comments

@afbora
Copy link
Member

afbora commented Sep 28, 2022

Broken plugins

Minor issues

Updated plugins for 3.8

Compatible plugins

@afbora afbora added this to the 3.8.0 or 3.8.x milestone Sep 28, 2022
@afbora afbora pinned this issue Sep 28, 2022
@getkirby getkirby deleted a comment from distantnative Sep 28, 2022
@afbora afbora self-assigned this Sep 29, 2022
@sebastiangreger
Copy link
Contributor

sebastiangreger commented Oct 2, 2022

/plugins/sebastiangreger --> /plugins/sgkirby 🙏 ✅

lukasbestle added a commit to getkirby/getkirby.com that referenced this issue Oct 3, 2022
@ennemoserandre
Copy link

ennemoserandre commented Oct 4, 2022

Can you please add the following plugin to the list? https://github.com/OblikStudio/kirby-link-field

I created already a issue: OblikStudio/kirby-link-field#65

@macx
Copy link

macx commented Oct 6, 2022

kirby-form-blocks us not working.

@trych
Copy link

trych commented Oct 6, 2022

The Kirby Relationship Field plugin does not show the already entered entries anymore. It does list entries, but those are empty.

In the content file, entries are still listed by their ids, so I assume that's the reason. If I add a new entry to the field that one is shown correctly.

Bildschirmfoto 2022-10-06 um 22 13 25

Bildschirmfoto 2022-10-06 um 22 16 48

@macx
Copy link

macx commented Oct 7, 2022

kirby-vite is also broken with this version.

My fault. kirby-vite IS compatible.

@olach
Copy link

olach commented Oct 7, 2022

The Relationship plugin is now compatible.
https://github.com/olach/kirby3-relationship

@splorp
Copy link

splorp commented Oct 19, 2022

Here are a few plugins that I’m using that are missing the required json information, from what I can tell.

https://github.com/pedroborges/kirby-meta-tags
https://github.com/schnti/kirby3-cachebuster
https://github.com/shoesforindustry/kirby-plugins-alphabetise

@trych
Copy link

trych commented Nov 10, 2022

Unfortunately, the issue with the relationship plugin that I described before has not been resolved yet. I still cannot transition a relationship field's content from a 3.7.5 project to a 3.8 project.

Also, it seems to have some more errors, that seem to be related to 3.8 (they do not happen when I downgrade to 3.7.5). So I would consider it as incompatible again, unfortunately.

olach/kirby3-relationship#16

Anybody could have a look at this? This basically broke a client's website. 😥

Edit: Sorry, turns out I was not updated to the latest plugin version.

@texnixe
Copy link
Member

texnixe commented Nov 11, 2022

@trych I just tried a fresh relationship plugin in a fresh 3.8.8.1 Starterkit without issues. The example from the readme in a note.yml

   related:
        label: Related articles
        type: relationship
        options: query
        query: page.siblings

stores the content like this:

Related: notes/through-the-desert, notes/chasing-waterfalls

as it should (so no uuids), because it is based on the tags field, not the pages field. It also works if I choose to store UUIDs instead. So would be helpful if you could post your field definition that does not work.

@trych
Copy link

trych commented Nov 11, 2022

@texnixe Thanks for testing, and it turns out that once again you were absolutely right. For some reason my git submodule command would not show me that there's updates to the plugin, so I assumed I already was on the most recent version, when in fact I wasn't. Sorry for making a fuss about nothing.

So I stand corrected: The relationship plugin works great and is in fact compatible with 3.8.

@splorp
Copy link

splorp commented Nov 11, 2022

The “Missing composer.json version” for the Alphabetize plugin was fixed with this PR:

shoesforindustry/kirby-plugins-alphabetise#6

I’m still trying to get the developer to create a proper release for the current version.

@splorp
Copy link

splorp commented Nov 13, 2022

I’ve created a PR to address the composer.json issues for the Cachebuster plugin

schnti/kirby3-cachebuster#10

Also contacted the developer to create a release for the current version.

@splorp
Copy link

splorp commented Nov 16, 2022

This PR schnti/kirby3-cachebuster#10 has been closed by the developer and a fixed version of the plugin has been tagged as a new release.

/schnti/kirby3-cachebuster/releases/tag/1.0.3

@afbora afbora removed this from the 3.9.x milestone Dec 17, 2022
@afbora
Copy link
Member Author

afbora commented Dec 17, 2022

Information about 3.8 compatibility has been sent to all plugins to open new issue or submit PR. It is the developers decision whether to apply the necessary changes or not.

@afbora afbora closed this as completed Dec 17, 2022
@afbora afbora unpinned this issue Dec 17, 2022
plain-solutions-gmbh added a commit to plain-solutions-gmbh/kirby-grid-block that referenced this issue Dec 18, 2022
@plain-solutions-gmbh
Copy link
Contributor

kirby-form-blocks us not working.

Kirby Form Blocks is no longer under maintenance! Please use Kirby Form Block Suite

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants