-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
feat: rect dom depth information #235
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily focus on enhancing the functionality and robustness of various components within the codebase. Key modifications include improvements to pagination handling in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
maxun-core/src/interpret.ts (1)
Line range hint
478-501: Wrap Switch Case Bodies to Restrict Variable ScopeVariables declared within a
caseclause in a switch statement are accessible in other cases due to JavaScript's scoping rules. This can lead to unexpected behavior if variables are unintentionally accessed from other cases.Wrap the bodies of each
casein braces{}to create a block scope:case 'clickNext': { const pageResults = await page.evaluate((cfg) => window.scrapeList(cfg), config); // Filter out already scraped items const newResults = pageResults.filter(item => { const uniqueKey = JSON.stringify(item); if (scrapedItems.has(uniqueKey)) return false; // Ignore if already scraped scrapedItems.add(uniqueKey); // Mark as scraped return true; }); allResults = allResults.concat(newResults); if (config.limit && allResults.length >= config.limit) { return allResults.slice(0, config.limit); } const nextButton = await page.$(config.pagination.selector); if (!nextButton) { return allResults; // No more pages to scrape } await Promise.all([ nextButton.dispatchEvent('click'), page.waitForNavigation({ waitUntil: 'networkidle' }) ]); await page.waitForTimeout(1000); break; } case 'clickLoadMore': { // ... existing code ... break; }This ensures that variables like
pageResults,newResults, andnextButtonare scoped only within their respective cases, preventing unintended access from other cases.Apply this modification to all
caseclauses where variables are declared to enhance code reliability and readability.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 476-476: Other switch clauses can erroneously access this declaration.
Wrap the declaration in a block to restrict its access to the switch clause.The declaration is defined in this switch clause:
Unsafe fix: Wrap the declaration in a block.
(lint/correctness/noSwitchDeclarations)
[error] 481-486: Other switch clauses can erroneously access this declaration.
Wrap the declaration in a block to restrict its access to the switch clause.The declaration is defined in this switch clause:
Unsafe fix: Wrap the declaration in a block.
(lint/correctness/noSwitchDeclarations)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
maxun-core/src/interpret.ts(2 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)server/src/browser-management/classes/RemoteBrowser.ts(4 hunks)server/src/workflow-management/selector.ts(4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
maxun-core/src/interpret.ts
[error] 481-486: Other switch clauses can erroneously access this declaration.
Wrap the declaration in a block to restrict its access to the switch clause.
The declaration is defined in this switch clause:
Unsafe fix: Wrap the declaration in a block.
(lint/correctness/noSwitchDeclarations)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
package.json (1)
39-39: Verify the New Dependency for Security Vulnerabilities
Ensure that the newly added dependency "idcac-playwright": "^0.1.3" is secure and does not introduce any known vulnerabilities.
Run the following script to check for security advisories related to idcac-playwright:
Please review the advisories, if any, and ensure the dependency is safe to use.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about this package to ensure its reliability.
Let me check the repository for additional information about this package.
Dependency idcac-playwright Verified as Safe to Use
The package is secure and suitable for use based on the following findings:
- No security vulnerabilities found in GitHub's advisory database
- It's maintained by Apify, a reputable organization
- It's a simple wrapper for the popular "I Don't Care About Cookies" browser extension
- The package has a clear, focused purpose: handling cookie consent popups in Playwright tests
- Regular maintenance with latest update in September 2024 (version 0.1.3)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for security advisories for 'idcac-playwright'
# Fetching advisories for 'idcac-playwright'
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "idcac-playwright") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
Length of output: 349
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check package details and download statistics
npm view idcac-playwright time --json
echo "---"
npm view idcac-playwright repository.url
echo "---"
# Get weekly downloads
npm view idcac-playwright downloads
Length of output: 431
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the repository's README and package.json
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apify/idcac/master/README.md
echo "---"
# Check if it's an official Apify package
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apify/idcac/master/package.json | jq '.author, .description'
Length of output: 1282
server/src/browser-management/classes/RemoteBrowser.ts (1)
18-18: Ensure Correct Invocation of getInjectableScript() with page.evaluate()
The getInjectableScript() function is being called and its result passed directly to this.currentPage.evaluate(). Verify that getInjectableScript() returns a string or function that can be executed by evaluate() synchronously. If getInjectableScript() returns a Promise, you should await its result before passing it to evaluate().
As a follow-up, confirm that getInjectableScript() is synchronous and compatible with page.evaluate(). Update the code if necessary:
- this.currentPage.evaluate(getInjectableScript())
+ const script = await getInjectableScript();
+ await this.currentPage.evaluate(script);Ensure error handling is in place to catch any exceptions during script injection.
Also applies to: 172-172, 377-377, 410-410
| const originalEl = document.elementFromPoint(x, y) as HTMLElement; | ||
| if (originalEl) { | ||
| let element = originalEl; | ||
|
|
||
| if (originalEl.tagName === 'A') { | ||
| element = originalEl; | ||
| } else if (originalEl.parentElement?.tagName === 'A') { | ||
| element = originalEl.parentElement; | ||
| } else { | ||
| // Generic parent finding logic based on visual containment | ||
| while (element.parentElement) { | ||
| const parentRect = element.parentElement.getBoundingClientRect(); | ||
| const childRect = element.getBoundingClientRect(); | ||
|
|
||
| // Check if parent visually contains the child | ||
| const fullyContained = | ||
| parentRect.left <= childRect.left && | ||
| parentRect.right >= childRect.right && | ||
| parentRect.top <= childRect.top && | ||
| parentRect.bottom >= childRect.bottom; | ||
|
|
||
| // Additional checks for more comprehensive containment | ||
| const significantOverlap = | ||
| (childRect.width * childRect.height) / | ||
| (parentRect.width * parentRect.height) > 0.5; | ||
|
|
||
| if (fullyContained && significantOverlap) { | ||
| element = element.parentElement; | ||
| } else { | ||
| break; | ||
| } | ||
| } } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor Repeated Visual Containment Logic into a Helper Function
The logic for determining the parent element based on visual containment is repeated across multiple functions (getElementInformation, getRect, getNonUniqueSelectors). This duplication can lead to maintenance challenges and potential inconsistencies.
Consider extracting this logic into a shared helper function, such as findVisuallyContainingElement(element: HTMLElement): HTMLElement, to promote code reuse and improve maintainability.
Also applies to: 114-146, 821-851
| (childRect.width * childRect.height) / | ||
| (parentRect.width * parentRect.height) > 0.5; | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Handle Potential Division by Zero in significantOverlap Calculation
In the computation of significantOverlap, there is a risk of division by zero when the parentRect.width * parentRect.height evaluates to zero. This can occur if the parent element has zero width or height, leading to a runtime error.
Add a check to ensure that parentRect.width * parentRect.height is not zero before performing the division:
const parentArea = parentRect.width * parentRect.height;
+ if (parentArea === 0) {
+ break;
+ }
const significantOverlap =
(childRect.width * childRect.height) / parentArea > 0.5;This prevents a potential division by zero error and ensures robust calculation.
Also applies to: 138-140, 842-844
|
|
||
| this.currentPage.on('framenavigated', (frame) => { | ||
| if (frame === this.currentPage?.mainFrame()) { | ||
| this.currentPage.evaluate(getInjectableScript()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor framenavigated Event Handler to Avoid Duplication
The framenavigated event handler is set up in multiple places (initialize, changeTab, initializeNewPage). This repetition can lead to code maintenance issues and potential discrepancies in behavior.
Consider extracting the event handler logic into a dedicated method and invoking it wherever needed. This promotes code reuse and simplifies future modifications.
+ private setupFrameNavigatedHandler(): void {
+ this.currentPage?.on('framenavigated', (frame) => {
+ if (frame === this.currentPage?.mainFrame()) {
+ this.currentPage?.evaluate(getInjectableScript());
+ this.socket.emit('urlChanged', this.currentPage.url());
+ }
+ });
+ }
public initialize = async (userId: string): Promise<void> => {
// ...
this.currentPage = await this.context.newPage();
+ this.setupFrameNavigatedHandler();
// ...
};
public changeTab = async (tabIndex: number): Promise<void> => {
// ...
this.currentPage = page;
+ this.setupFrameNavigatedHandler();
// ...
};
private initializeNewPage = async (options?: Object): Promise<void> => {
// ...
this.currentPage = newPage;
+ this.setupFrameNavigatedHandler();
// ...
};This refactoring enhances maintainability and ensures consistent behavior across different workflows.
Also applies to: 377-377, 410-410
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Dependencies
"idcac-playwright": "^0.1.3".Bug Fixes