Skip to content

Conversation

@RohitR311
Copy link
Collaborator

@RohitR311 RohitR311 commented Dec 10, 2024

  1. Handle context destroyed due to frame navigation
  2. Check for significant URL changes while performing frame navigation
  3. Enable fallback mechanisms for click and waitForLoadState action events

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced action execution with improved error handling and flexibility.
    • Improved URL change management and event handling for better page interaction.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Refined pagination handling for better compatibility with web applications.
  • Documentation

    • Updated method signatures and added new methods for clarity.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 10, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several enhancements to the Interpreter and RemoteBrowser classes. In Interpreter, a new helper function executeAction is added to streamline action execution, with improved error handling and pagination logic. The RemoteBrowser class receives updates to manage URL changes more effectively, including new methods for URL normalization and event handling. Overall, the changes improve the robustness and clarity of the action execution and page event management processes.

Changes

File Change Summary
maxun-core/src/interpret.ts - Added executeAction method for streamlined action execution with error handling.
- Updated carryOutSteps to utilize executeAction.
- Refined pagination handling using dispatchEvent('click').
server/src/browser-management/classes/RemoteBrowser.ts - Added lastEmittedUrl property.
- Introduced normalizeUrl and shouldEmitUrlChange methods for URL management.
- Refactored event listener setup into setupPageEventListeners.

Possibly related PRs

  • feat: extract behind login #229: The changes in this PR also modify the Interpreter class in maxun-core/src/interpret.ts, specifically enhancing the carryOutSteps method, which is directly related to the modifications made in the main PR regarding action execution and logging.

Suggested labels

Type: Feature, Status: In Review

Suggested reviewers

  • amhsirak

Poem

In the land of code where bunnies play,
New helpers hop in to brighten the day.
With actions refined and URLs neat,
Our scripts dance along, oh what a treat!
So here’s to the changes, both clever and bright,
May our workflows be smooth, and our bugs take flight! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@amhsirak amhsirak merged commit 59cee8e into develop Dec 10, 2024
1 check was pending
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
maxun-core/src/interpret.ts (2)

499-512: Improve Error Logging in Action Execution

In the error handling for waitForLoadState and click methods, the caught errors are not logged. This can make debugging difficult when an action fails.

Consider logging the errors to provide better visibility into any issues during execution.

Apply this diff to log errors:

if (methodName === 'waitForLoadState') {
  try {
    await executeAction(invokee, methodName, step.args);
  } catch (error) {
+   this.log(`Error in waitForLoadState with args ${JSON.stringify(step.args)}: ${error.message}`, Level.ERROR);
    await executeAction(invokee, methodName, 'domcontentloaded');
  }
} else if (methodName === 'click') {
  try {
    await executeAction(invokee, methodName, step.args);
  } catch (error) {
+   this.log(`Error in click with args ${JSON.stringify(step.args)}: ${error.message}`, Level.ERROR);
    await executeAction(invokee, methodName, [step.args[0], { force: true }]);
  }
} else {
  await executeAction(invokee, methodName, step.args);
}

594-594: Use Playwright's click() Method Instead of dispatchEvent('click')

In the pagination handling, dispatchEvent('click') is used to simulate a click on the "Load More" button. This approach may bypass Playwright's built-in event handling, potentially leading to flaky tests or missed actions.

Consider using Playwright's click() method, which ensures proper event dispatching and waits for the element to be actionable.

Apply this diff:

- await loadMoreButton.dispatchEvent('click');
+ await loadMoreButton.click();
server/src/browser-management/classes/RemoteBrowser.ts (1)

133-148: Enhance Retry Mechanism for Script Injection

In the load event listener, if the script injection fails, the injectScript function only attempts once. Network delays or slow page loads might require additional retry attempts.

Consider implementing a retry mechanism with multiple attempts and delays between retries to improve reliability.

Example modification:

const injectScript = async (): Promise<boolean> => {
+  const maxAttempts = 3;
+  for (let attempt = 1; attempt <= maxAttempts; attempt++) {
     try {
       await page.waitForLoadState('networkidle', { timeout: 5000 });
       await page.evaluate(getInjectableScript());
       return true;
     } catch (error: any) {
       logger.log('warn', `Script injection attempt ${attempt} failed: ${error.message}`);
+      if (attempt === maxAttempts) {
+        return false;
+      }
+      await page.waitForTimeout(1000 * attempt); // Exponential backoff
     }
+  }
};
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1383193 and c7af54e.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • maxun-core/src/interpret.ts (3 hunks)
  • server/src/browser-management/classes/RemoteBrowser.ts (5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
server/src/browser-management/classes/RemoteBrowser.ts (2)

93-108: Ensure Comprehensive URL Normalization

The normalizeUrl method may not account for all URL variations, such as default ports, query parameters, or hash fragments, which could affect URL comparison.

Please verify whether additional normalization is required for accurate URL comparisons, especially if URLs differ only by trailing slashes, ports, or case sensitivity.

✅ Verification successful

Let me check the usage context of normalizeUrl to better understand if additional normalization is needed.


Current URL normalization is sufficient for its use case

The normalizeUrl method is only used within the shouldEmitUrlChange method to compare URLs and prevent duplicate navigation events. The current implementation adequately handles the essential aspects:

  • Normalizes protocol case
  • Handles trailing slashes consistently
  • Provides fallback for invalid URLs
  • Maintains URL object's built-in normalization of hostname case and default ports

Since the method is private and only used for equality comparison in navigation change detection, the current level of normalization is appropriate for its specific purpose.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for usages of `normalizeUrl` and validate URL comparison logic.

# Search for all calls to `normalizeUrl`
rg 'normalizeUrl'

# Review comparisons and ensure they handle default ports and case sensitivity

Length of output: 358


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the context around normalizeUrl usage
rg -B 5 -A 5 'normalizeUrl\(' server/src/browser-management/classes/RemoteBrowser.ts

Length of output: 927


69-70: Initialize lastEmittedUrl Consistently

The lastEmittedUrl property is initialized as null, but later in the code, normalizeUrl may return undefined if it cannot parse the URL.

Ensure that normalizeUrl always returns a string to prevent unexpected undefined values, which could lead to errors during URL comparisons.

Comment on lines +472 to +479
const executeAction = async (invokee: any, methodName: string, args: any) => {
console.log("Executing action:", methodName, args);
if (!args || Array.isArray(args)) {
await (<any>invokee[methodName])(...(args ?? []));
} else {
await (<any>invokee[methodName])(args);
}
};
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance Type Safety in executeAction Function

The executeAction function uses any types for invokee, methodName, and args, which can lead to runtime errors due to lack of type checking. Casting with <any> may hide potential issues if the method does not exist or is incorrectly invoked.

Consider specifying more precise types or using generics to improve type safety.

Apply this diff to enhance type safety:

- const executeAction = async (invokee: any, methodName: string, args: any) => {
+ const executeAction = async (invokee: Record<string, Function>, methodName: string, args: any[] | any) => {
    console.log("Executing action:", methodName, args);
    if (!args || Array.isArray(args)) {
      await invokee[methodName](...(args ?? []));
    } else {
      await invokee[methodName](args);
    }
  };
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const executeAction = async (invokee: any, methodName: string, args: any) => {
console.log("Executing action:", methodName, args);
if (!args || Array.isArray(args)) {
await (<any>invokee[methodName])(...(args ?? []));
} else {
await (<any>invokee[methodName])(args);
}
};
const executeAction = async (invokee: Record<string, Function>, methodName: string, args: any[] | any) => {
console.log("Executing action:", methodName, args);
if (!args || Array.isArray(args)) {
await invokee[methodName](...(args ?? []));
} else {
await invokee[methodName](args);
}
};

Comment on lines +121 to +150
private async setupPageEventListeners(page: Page) {
page.on('framenavigated', async (frame) => {
if (frame === page.mainFrame()) {
const currentUrl = page.url();
if (this.shouldEmitUrlChange(currentUrl)) {
this.lastEmittedUrl = currentUrl;
this.socket.emit('urlChanged', currentUrl);
}
}
});

// Handle page load events with retry mechanism
page.on('load', async () => {
const injectScript = async (): Promise<boolean> => {
try {
await page.waitForLoadState('networkidle', { timeout: 5000 });

await page.evaluate(getInjectableScript());
return true;
} catch (error: any) {
logger.log('warn', `Script injection attempt failed: ${error.message}`);
return false;
}
};

const success = await injectScript();
console.log("Script injection result:", success);
});
}

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Prevent Duplicate Event Listeners on Pages

The setupPageEventListeners method adds event listeners to the page. If this method is called multiple times on the same page instance, it could result in multiple listeners being registered, causing duplicate events.

Consider removing existing event listeners before adding new ones or checking if listeners already exist.

Apply this diff to prevent duplicate listeners:

+ // Remove existing listeners to prevent duplication
+ page.removeListener('framenavigated', this.framenavigatedHandler);
+ page.removeListener('load', this.loadHandler);

+ // Define handlers as class properties to maintain references
+ private framenavigatedHandler = async (frame: Frame) => { /* existing code */ };
+ private loadHandler = async () => { /* existing code */ };

page.on('framenavigated', this.framenavigatedHandler);
page.on('load', this.loadHandler);

Alternatively, ensure setupPageEventListeners is called only once per page instance.

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Type: Bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants