Skip to content

Conversation

@liuzicheng1987
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @liuzicheng1987, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a fundamental change to the error handling paradigm within the serialization framework. By transitioning from noexcept functions and simple return codes to C++ exceptions, the system aims to provide a more explicit and robust mechanism for reporting and managing errors during data serialization. This refactoring impacts a wide array of serialization formats, ensuring consistent error propagation and enhancing resource management, particularly evident in the JSON and BSON implementations.

Highlights

  • Error Handling Strategy: The primary change involves a significant shift in error handling across all serialization writers. Functions that previously used noexcept or returned error codes now throw std::runtime_error exceptions to signal failures.
  • Noexcept Removal: The noexcept specifier has been removed from a large number of writer methods across various formats (Avro, BSON, Cap'n Proto, CBOR, Flexbuffers, JSON, MessagePack, TOML, UBJSON, XML, YAML) to allow for exception propagation.
  • Exception Introduction: Specific error conditions in BSON, JSON, and MessagePack writer implementations now explicitly throw std::runtime_error when underlying library calls fail.
  • Result Monad for Avro and MessagePack: For Avro and MessagePack, top-level write functions now return a Result monad to encapsulate potential errors, with non-noexcept overloads calling .value() to re-throw exceptions if an error occurred.
  • Resource Management Improvements: The JSON writer (json::Writer) now uses std::shared_ptr to manage yyjson_mut_doc resources, ensuring proper cleanup.
  • Generic Byte Container Concept: BSON and MessagePack readers and writers have been updated to utilize a new concepts::MutableContiguousByteContainer for more generic handling of byte sequence types.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request is a great step forward in improving the robustness of the library. It refactors the writer classes to use exceptions for error handling, which is a significant and positive change. This is achieved by removing noexcept specifiers and, more importantly, adding checks for return values from the underlying serialization libraries, throwing exceptions on failure. The introduction of RAII for resource management in bson and json writers using std::shared_ptr with custom deleters is an excellent improvement for resource safety. The generalization of byte containers using concepts is also a good enhancement. I have found one place where an error check was missed, but otherwise, the changes are solid.

@liuzicheng1987 liuzicheng1987 merged commit 2b1cd83 into main Oct 27, 2025
292 checks passed
@liuzicheng1987 liuzicheng1987 deleted the f/writer_error_handling branch October 27, 2025 22:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants