Skip to content

Conversation

@Curve
Copy link
Contributor

@Curve Curve commented Nov 21, 2025

See #548.

This PR allows implicit conversion of int64_t values stored in rfl::Generic to double (via to_double) if no loss of precision occurs.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @Curve, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the rfl::Generic utility by extending the functionality of its to_double() method. Previously, this method strictly required the underlying value to be a double. Now, it intelligently handles int64_t values, allowing them to be converted to double only when such a conversion guarantees no loss of precision, thereby improving flexibility while maintaining data integrity.

Highlights

  • int64_t to double Conversion: The rfl::Generic::to_double() method now supports converting int64_t values to double.
  • Precision Safeguard: This conversion is only performed if it can be done without any loss of precision. If precision would be lost, an rfl::Error is returned instead of the converted value.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly implements a feature to allow converting int64_t values stored in rfl::Generic to double, including a check to prevent loss of precision. The logic for the conversion is sound. However, I've identified a critical issue where the new error-handling path can throw an exception inside a noexcept-qualified function. This would lead to program termination. My review includes a comment detailing this issue and how to resolve it by removing the noexcept specifier from to_double() and other similar functions in the class.

@liuzicheng1987
Copy link
Contributor

@Curve , thanks for your contribution!

@liuzicheng1987 liuzicheng1987 merged commit 331a979 into getml:main Nov 23, 2025
146 checks passed
@Curve
Copy link
Contributor Author

Curve commented Nov 23, 2025

@Curve , thanks for your contribution!

No problem, thanks for the quick merge!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants