Skip to content

Conversation

@marcrupt
Copy link
Collaborator

@marcrupt marcrupt commented Nov 18, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Updated README with revised TypeScript SDK usage examples reflecting the new streamlined client initialization approach for improved clarity
  • Refactor

    • Simplified the Sendook client constructor interface; the API key parameter is now accepted as a direct string argument instead of within an options object, reducing initialization boilerplate and enhancing developer experience

@marcrupt marcrupt requested a review from ahmedmawiri November 18, 2025 17:14
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 18, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
sendook Building Building Preview Comment Nov 18, 2025 5:14pm
sendook-app Building Building Preview Comment Nov 18, 2025 5:14pm

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 18, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The TypeScript SDK usage example in the README.md is updated to reflect a simplified Sendook client constructor. The constructor signature changes from accepting an options object with an apiKey property to accepting a string parameter directly.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
SDK Documentation
README.md
Updated TypeScript SDK usage example to show new constructor signature: new Sendook("your_api_key") instead of new Sendook({ apiKey: "your_api_key" })

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

  • Simple documentation update reflecting a straightforward API change
  • Single file modified with consistent, repetitive pattern change
  • No logic complexity or multi-file coordination required

Poem

🐰 A string so simple, no objects in sight,
The Sendook client now shines bright!
"your_api_key" flows so clean,
The simplest constructor ever seen! ✨

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch marc/readme-sendook-init-fix

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 87240d8 and 20182d8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@ahmedmawiri ahmedmawiri merged commit 75ff5a3 into main Nov 18, 2025
1 of 4 checks passed
@ahmedmawiri ahmedmawiri deleted the marc/readme-sendook-init-fix branch November 18, 2025 17:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants