Fix grammar README: Update non-terminal naming rules #17330
+1
−1
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I noticed the grammar README documentation was outdated. It stated that rule names must be 'dashed lowercase words', but when I looked at the examples like
c.gbnf, I saw it usesdataTypewith an uppercase letter.After checking the discussion in #7720, it's clear the parser actually supports much more flexibility than the docs suggested:
This PR updates the documentation to accurately reflect what the parser actually supports. The examples work fine - the docs just needed updating to match reality.
Changes:
This should help people understand they have more flexibility when naming their grammar rules.
Fixes #7720