-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
C++: Fix mismatching new/free FP in template code. #3050
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions
2
cpp/ql/test/query-tests/Critical/NewFree/NewFreeMismatch.expected
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ | ||
// semmle-extractor-options: -std=gnu++14 | ||
|
||
typedef unsigned long size_t; | ||
|
||
void *malloc(size_t size); | ||
void free(void *ptr); | ||
|
||
void* operator new(size_t _Size, void *_Where); | ||
|
||
// --- | ||
|
||
template<typename T> | ||
class MyTest2Class | ||
{ | ||
public: | ||
MyTest2Class() | ||
{ | ||
int *a = new int; | ||
free(a); // BAD | ||
|
||
int *ptr_b = (int *)malloc(sizeof(int)); | ||
int *b = new(ptr_b) int; | ||
free(b); // GOOD | ||
|
||
c = new int; | ||
free(c); // BAD | ||
|
||
int *ptr_d = (int *)malloc(sizeof(int)); | ||
d = new(ptr_d) int; | ||
free(d); // GOOD | ||
} | ||
|
||
int *c, *d; | ||
}; | ||
|
||
MyTest2Class<int> mt2c_i; |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure why these locations moved slightly - did you rebuild the extractor between test runs?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can't explain that. I'll re-trigger the CI and merge if it's successful.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm unlikely to have rebuilt the extractor, but it's likely I generated the first set of results, then tweaked the test code slightly and forgot to re-run the tests until the next commit. (and if the tests passed on here I'm not worried)