Skip to content

Conversation

RasmusWL
Copy link
Member

Fixes https://github.com/github/codeql-python-team/issues/53

Closing #3164 which was my initial attempt at figuring out how to do this. In this PR I made use of a DataFlowExtension, which seems like a better (and more modular) way of implementing this, than changing isAdditionalFlowStep of the configuration.. at least this approach made it very simple to test my changes 👍.

Copy link
Contributor

@tausbn tausbn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me, but the test results need to be updated. 👍

@RasmusWL
Copy link
Member Author

RasmusWL commented Jun 4, 2020

...

you gotta be kitten me

@RasmusWL RasmusWL requested a review from tausbn June 4, 2020 14:34
@semmle-qlci semmle-qlci merged commit 1a7570e into github:master Jun 8, 2020
@RasmusWL RasmusWL deleted the python-fabric-execute branch June 8, 2020 15:00
RasmusWL added a commit to RasmusWL/codeql that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2020
I looked through PRs between rc/1.24 and rc/1.25 and added missing change notes for:

- github#3314
- github#3302
- github#3212
- github#3453
- github#3407
- github#3563

```
git log --grep="Merge pull request" --format=oneline rc/1.24..rc/1.25 -- python/
```
luchua-bc pushed a commit to luchua-bc/ql that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2020
I looked through PRs between rc/1.24 and rc/1.25 and added missing change notes for:

- github#3314
- github#3302
- github#3212
- github#3453
- github#3407
- github#3563

```
git log --grep="Merge pull request" --format=oneline rc/1.24..rc/1.25 -- python/
```
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants