[daily regulatory] Regulatory Report - 2026-02-19 #16905
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This report has been superseded by a newer daily regulatory report. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
This regulatory report reviews 9 daily reports generated on 2026-02-19 for the
github/gh-awrepository. Overall data quality is good, with consistent metrics across reports that share the same scope. Two critical issues require attention: a 0% Copilot agent session success rate (all 4 sessions failed on 2026-02-18) and a persistent 0% discussion answer rate (0 of 100 discussions answered). Workflow infrastructure health is strong with Safe Outputs at 94.1% success and no firewall policy violations detected.Cross-report consistency is high for key metrics. Token consumption is down 49.8% from the previous tracked period, consistent with a lighter scheduling day. The Daily Status report lacked issue data entirely, which represents a data gap. Code quality scores are improving (82/100) but code churn stability remains low (4/15) due to active WASM Playground development.
📋 Full Regulatory Report
📊 Reports Reviewed
🔍 Data Consistency Analysis
Cross-Report Metrics Comparison
Scope Notes:
open_prs: Performance reports "3 open" (of the 100 sampled), Status reports "6 open". Small variance may reflect sampling vs full-state difference.contributors: Performance uses PR authors over 90d; Status uses commit authors over 7d; Team Evolution counts today's committers — all expected to differ.issues_analyzed: Performance caps at 1,000 total issues; Status reported 0 issue nodes (data gap).Consistency Score
🚨 Critical Issues
1. Copilot Agent Sessions — 0% Success Rate
*.lock.ymlworkflows fail 100% on Copilot branches) combined with reviewer agents consistently returningaction_required..lock.ymlworkflows fail on Copilot branches; review the reviewer-agent thresholds that are blocking all Copilot PRs.2. Discussion Answer Rate — Persistent 0%
discussions_answered / total_discussions= 0/100 (0%)1. Daily Status Report — Issue Data Empty
2. compiler_yaml.go — Below Quality Threshold
compiler_yaml.goat 71/100 — below the stated 75/100 human-written quality threshold. Drivers: 2 functions >150 lines, 6 missing doc comments.3. Code Churn Stability — 4/15
4. Firewall Block Rate — 43.4%
-placeholder (pre-DNS/internal kernel attempts — not explicit deny-list hits).📈 Trend Analysis
Week-over-Week Comparison (Available Data)
Notable Trends
📝 Per-Report Analysis
Performance Summary (#16902)
Time Period: Last 90 days | Quality: ✅ Valid
Notes: Issue and PR data is capped at 1,000 and 100 items respectively due to API limits. Discussion answer rate of 0% is the key concern.
Daily Firewall Report (#16698)
Time Period: Last 7 days | Quality: ✅ Valid
-placeholder)Notes: No explicit deny-listed domains triggered. All blocks are pre-DNS internal attempts.
Copilot Token Consumption (#16797)
Time Period: Last 30 days | Quality: ✅ Valid
Safe Output Health (#16747)
Time Period: Last 24 hours | Quality: ✅ Valid
Error: Duplicate Code Detector — "Assign Copilot to created issues" step failed (FORBIDDEN: target repository not writable).
Daily Code Metrics (#16800)
Time Period: Point-in-time snapshot | Quality: ✅ Valid
💡 Recommendations
Process Improvements
.lock.ymlworkflows fail on Copilot branches — this blocks 100% of agent-driven PRs from landing.issues.jsonreturns 0 nodes for the Status workflow — may be a permissions or query scope issue.Data Quality Actions
Workflow Suggestions
action_requiredon Copilot PRs (100% rate). Review thresholds and consider a "pass with suggestions" mode to unblock Copilot iterations.📊 Regulatory Metrics
References:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions