You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Report Period: 2026-02-23 00:53 UTC Issues Analyzed: 63 total open issues Issues Processed (under-labeled): 4 Labels Applied: 7 total Previously Unlabeled: 0 (all issues had at least one label, but 4 were missing critical type labels)
Observation: The most common pattern was issues created by community members or the ai-inspected bot that received metadata/source labels but were missing the critical issue-type label (bug or enhancement).
Recommendations
Improve ai-inspected workflow: Issues receiving ai-inspected should also automatically receive a type label (bug, enhancement, etc.)
Community issues need type labels: Issues labeled community often arrive with only that label — the auto-triage agent should be triggered on community label events
Pattern to watch: 4 of 63 (6.3%) issues were missing type labels, above the 5% target — primarily community-submitted issues and bot-inspected issues that received metadata labels without type classification
Confidence Assessment
Overall Success: High — all 4 issues confidently classified with no need for needs-triage
Human Review Needed: 0 issues flagged
Next Steps: Consider configuring auto-triage to trigger when ai-inspected or community labels are applied to catch these cases proactively
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
🏷️ Auto-Triage Report Summary
Report Period: 2026-02-23 00:53 UTC
Issues Analyzed: 63 total open issues
Issues Processed (under-labeled): 4
Labels Applied: 7 total
Previously Unlabeled: 0 (all issues had at least one label, but 4 were missing critical type labels)
Key Metrics
bug(2),enhancement(2),workflows(3)Classification Summary
bug,workflowscreate-pull-requestsafe output fails — had onlycommunity,ai-inspectedbug,workflowspush_to_pull_request_branchgenerates bad patch — had onlyai-inspectedenhancementsafe-outputs,ai-inspectedenhancement,workflowscommunityView Detailed Classification Analysis
Issue #17289 —
create-pull-requestfails with cross-repo checkoutbug(core type),workflows(component)community,ai-inspected(metadata labels only, no type)Issue #16925 —
push_to_pull_request_branchbad patchbug(core type),workflows(component)ai-inspected(metadata only)Issue #17352 — Verify paths in pushes and create PRs
enhancement(core type)safe-outputs,ai-inspectedIssue #15836 — Comment with link to create PR
enhancement(core type),workflows(component)community(metadata only)View Label Distribution After Triage
Labels added this run:
bug: 2 issues (create-pull-request safe output fails with "No changes to commit" when workspace is a cross-repo checkout #17289,push_to_pull_request_branchgenerates a bad patch when triggered via anissue_commentevent on a PR #16925)enhancement: 2 issues (Consider verifying paths in pushes and create PRs #17352, Create a comment with a link to create a pull request #15836)workflows: 3 issues (create-pull-request safe output fails with "No changes to commit" when workspace is a cross-repo checkout #17289,push_to_pull_request_branchgenerates a bad patch when triggered via anissue_commentevent on a PR #16925, Create a comment with a link to create a pull request #15836)Observation: The most common pattern was issues created by community members or the
ai-inspectedbot that received metadata/source labels but were missing the critical issue-type label (bugorenhancement).Recommendations
ai-inspectedworkflow: Issues receivingai-inspectedshould also automatically receive a type label (bug,enhancement, etc.)communityoften arrive with only that label — the auto-triage agent should be triggered oncommunitylabel eventsConfidence Assessment
needs-triageai-inspectedorcommunitylabels are applied to catch these cases proactivelyReferences: §22289155813
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions